Answer:
d. demonstration.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. simulation.
b. model.
c. case study.
d. demonstration.
This is an example of a demonstration. A demonstration is an example in which the person exemplifies how something is performed. This is usually a practical exhibition, and it allows the person to give proof or evidence of how something operates. In this example, April is able to show the difference between pressure and force through her demonstration.
In our current world two societal changes are happening very quickly:
1. The mainstream of LGBTQ community and their marriage rights
2. The development of Multiple Genders or the concept of Gender Fluidity
A large part of the American population is still resistant to the above concepts and even though gay marriages are legal and there is a huge liberal support for these movements, things are different in the American heartland.
Both these concepts completely change the model of a society as we know if it. It seeks to present gender and gender roles as a 'social construct' and tries to move people away from 'traditional marriages' in what they say is modern human society.
Not only tradition, both concepts are also alien to the Christian faith which categorically defines marriage as between a man and a women. The Christian faith also defines Gay relationships as immoral and sinful.
Hence, in the coming decades we will continue to see huge resistance from conservatives against these movements but it is possible that in the half century, most of America is supporting these changes.
<span>Labor
was divided among the Eastern Woodlands people by having men hunt animals
and some of them fished in the lakes and rivers, while most of the women
prepared food and used the animal skins to make clothing and moccasins.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>
- Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
- Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
- Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
- While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
- The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.
<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>
Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>
If an online connection is not well established, most likely the person will not feel confident knowing the other person in person. Usually people tend to develop different personalities when they are chatting online, no matter how much the conversation is through videos and things like that, it is easier to see the person and their real "I" personally, this makes many people not feel confident in meet in person, because that virtual image that was created can be undone and not be real.