Answer:
Social situations can create an awareness of problems that demand attention, information about which may be sought through the media.
Explanation:
Whenever a certain social situation occurs, there would be conflicting opinion on how people would perceive those situations.
Most people generally would want to find instant gratifications by reading the news about that social situation presented in a way that cater to their personal opinion.
This type of behavior make most media realize that they can modify the way they presented the news in order to target specific demographic regardless of the truth.
Answer: Jim is using
punishment
<span>to modify the behavior of those people
</span>A punishment is an unpleasant outcome upon a group or an individual, as a target of authority. This is a response to a particular action, in this case it was the fact that people were talking, that is deemed undesirable or unacceptable.
Answer:
The guideline under this choice is that the first Amendment must ensure "unpopular opinion" offered that the larger part input is as of now secured. Regardless of whether Nazis intentionally picked a Jewish people group for their meeting, this was "serene" and the State reserved no option to forestall it. Besides, it makes a differentiation among activity and discourse, representative discourse, such as wearing Swastikas, is ensured as discourse and can't be prohibited or confined. The court concluded that it was desirable over permit this gathering to vent their scorn than to permit government to mention to residents what to think and state. This choice is significant, it made the way for emblematic discourse from numerous points of view, regardless of whether hostile for certain gatherings. Regardless of whether this is certain or negative relies upon out perspectives on freedom.
