All categories

2 years ago

Which explains why the graphs of geometric sequences are a series of unconnected points rather than a smooth curve?

2 answers:

9 0

<span> Which explains why the graphs of geometric sequences are a series of unconnected points rather than a smooth curve?

</span>
<span> The domain contains only natural numbers. </span>

kondor19780726 [428]2 years ago

4 0

<h3><u>Answer:</u></h3>

The correct answer is:

The domain contains only natural numbers.

<h3><u>Step-by-step explanation:</u></h3>

The graphs of geometric sequences are a series of unconnected points rather than a smooth curve because:

The domain contains only natural numbers.

<em> As the geometric sequence us given as:</em>

<em> $a_1=a,a_2=ar,a_3=ar^2,....$ </em>

where a is the first term of the sequence and r is the common ratio of the geometric sequence.

Also $a_n$ denotes the nth term of the sequence where n belongs to natural numbers that is the domain of the function is natural numbers.

You might be interested in

A conditional relative frequency table is generated by row from a set of data. The conditional relative frequencies of the two c

Gre4nikov [31]

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D.) There is likely an association between the categorical variables because the relative frequencies are both close to 0.50." Given that a relative frequencies of 0.48 and 0.52, there will be an association between the categorical variables.<span>
</span>

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Zoe had x dollars on Monday.

mel-nik [20]

13.00 I think I don’t know if that correct but that’s what I got

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In ΔXYZ, m∠X = 70° and m∠Y = 88°. Which statement about the sides of ΔXYZ must be true?

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Z must equal 22° because it will add up to 180° it is an acute scalene triangle

8 0

2 years ago

Determine if 0.515115111511115111115... is rational or irrational and give

GREYUIT [131]

It’s rational, for a number to be rational you have to be able to write it as a fraction and you can write 0.515115111511115111115... as a fraction.

7 0

2 years ago

If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22°, can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not?

Paul [167]

Answer: The ΔVZX and ΔWXZ are not congruent by SAS.

Explanation:

It is given that the VX = WZ = 40 cm and ∠ZVX = ∠XWZ = 22°.

Draw a figure as shown below,

According to the SAS rule of congruence, two triangles are congruent if two sides and their inclined angle is equal.

From the given figure it is easily noticed that in ΔVZX and ΔWXZ,

$VX=WZ=40cm$ (given)

$\angle ZVX=\angle XWZ=22^{\circ}$ (given)

$XZ=XZ$ (common side)

Since we have two sides and one angle is same. but we can not conclude that the ΔVZX and ΔWXZ are congruent by SAS, because the given angle is not the inclined angle of both equal sides.

Therefore, the ΔVZX and ΔWXZ are not congruent by SAS.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers