Split-brain is a lay term to portray the outcome when the corpus callosum interfacing the two hemispheres of the brain is severed to some degree. It is a People who have their corpus callosum severed for medical reasons would be able to tell you about which images shown to "only the right visual field".
relationship of indications created by disturbance of or obstruction with the association between the hemispheres of the brain.
People with a severed corpus callosum did not demonstrate any critical contrast in work from people with flawless corpus callosum, despite the fact that their hemispheres couldn't impart because of the disjoining of the corpus callosum.
Answer:
Preschoolers:
cannot distinguish moral imperatives from social conventions
Explanation:
Preschoolers are those within the group of school children within the age range of 3 - 5 years. Most of this preschoolers acquire skills such as naming colors, showing affection, and hopping on one foot which are generally called developmental milestones.
<em>Because of the age of this category of students, they would not be able to distinguish between moral impertives from social conventions. Most of their personality and ways of thinking is improved through their interaction with their family and people around them.</em>
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
Answer and Explanation:
Given that we live in a federative republic, where state and local governments must share responsibility with the federal government, I believe that the role of the federal government in education should not be expanded, but the role of state and local governments. This is because the federal government knows the educational needs of the national territory in a generalized way, and may not, in fact, meet the needs of each region. However, state and local governments know this need in a more specific and complete way, in this case, the increase in the roles of this government with education can be much more profitable and advantageous than the increase in the role of the federal government.
