Answer:
No, there would be no existence of a transfer price that would make both the Receiver and Industrial Products Division financially better off than if the Industrial Products Division were to continue buying its receivers from the outside supplier
Explanation:
Assuming that the receiver division is selling all of the receivers it can produce to outside customers, there will be no existence of a transfer price that would make both the receiver and industrial products division financially better off than if the industrial products division were to continue buying its receivers from the outside supplier.
Reason being that the minimum transfer price that the selling division should be willing to accept surpasses the maximum transfer price that the buying division should be willing to accept.
Answer:
$175,000
Explanation:
Conversion costs are production costs that must be incurred in order to change raw materials into products.
Therefore, we have:
Total of the conversion costs = Cost of clay used in production + wages paid to the workers who paint the figurines = $76,000 + $99,000 = $175,000
Answer:
Present Value= $19,652.37
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You are the financial manager for a recreation center that has signed an option to purchase new elliptical machines for $22,500 in two years. If you have an investment opportunity that guarantees 7% interest.
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 22,500/ (1.07^2)= $19,652.37
This is an Affirming the Consequent argument. It is the name
of an invalid conditional argument form or an invalid form of the modus ponens.
This is easily identified by remembering that any argument
that affirms the consequent is invalid.
