Answer:
D. $490,000
Explanation:
The inventory was valued at first-in, first-out (FIFO) costs and totaled $500,000.
<em>Adjustments:</em>
The goods worth $10,000 (1,000 units x $10 cost) were shipped and billed to a customer meaning that company has already recorded the sales in its income statement therefore they became the property of the customer and should not have been included in the inventory count. The $10,000 should be removed from the inventory recorded bringing the inventory balance at $490,000 ($500,000 - $10,000).
The goods worth $30,000 (6,000 units x $5 cost) will not be included in the total inventory count because the inventory is held on consignment for one of the company's supplier and the ownership of the goods belongs to the consignor (in this case, the supplier) until they are sold. The goods appear in the inventory records of the consignor (in this case, supplier) not the consignee (in this case, the company). In this case, the company has not included the goods in its inventory cost therefore no adjustment is necessary.
Answer:
In a situation in which the transactions that occurred were been arranged accordingly or just exactly the way the transaction happened which means that the customer will owe the amount of $22.
In a situation in which the transactions are been posted in descending order which is from largest transaction to the smallest transactions the customer money in his or her bank account will reduce quickly which will in turn make customer to have the amount of $88 as overdraft.
Explanation:
In a situation in which the transactions that occurred were been arranged accordingly or just exactly the way the transaction happened which means that the customer will owe the amount of $22 because based on the information given we were told that the customer original order resulted in one $22 fee which means that 1 multiply by $22 fee will give us $22 (1*22) which is the amount owe by the customer.
Secondly in a situation in which the transactions are been posted in descending order which is from largest transaction to the smallest transactions the customer money in his or her bank account will reduce quickly which will in turn make the customer to have the amount of $88 as overdraft reason been that we were been told that the reordering resulted in four $22 fee which means that four multiply by $22 fee will give us $88 (4*22).
Answer:
30%
Explanation:
The computation of return on investment is shown below:-
Return on Sales = Credit sales × Return on sales
= $24,000 × 5%
= $1,200
Investment in Accounts Receivable
= $24,000 × 1 ÷ 6
= $4,000
Return on Investment = Return on Sales ÷ Investment in Accounts Receivable × 100
= $1,200 ÷ $4,000 × 100
= 30%
Therefore for computing the return on investment we simply divide the investment in account receivable by return on sales.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The weighted average contribution margin is calculated by multiplying individual contribution margin with respective size pizzas (i.e number of units sold) then total contribution margin (i.e of both medium and large size) is divided upon total number of units sold, see as follows:
According to Buttercrust Pizza company's sales data medium pizzas sold are twice the number of large pizzas. Now here we have to take an assumption since we aren't given actual sales units. Keeping in mind the sales data we can assume that 100 units of medium pizzas and 50 units of large pizzas are sold during the period.
Contribution margin of medium pizza: (CM× units of medium size pizzas)
Contribution margin of large pizza: (CM× units of large size pizzas)
Contribution margin of medium pizza: $10× 100 = $1000
Contribution margin of large pizza: $22× 50 = $1100
Total contribution (of both pizza sizes) = $2100
Total sales units (of both pizza sizes) = 150
The weighted average contribution margin is calculated as follows:
WACM= $2100÷ 150
WACM= $14
(Disclaimer: the solution of this question has been concluded using self-induced assumptions.)
