The Nixon case is a perfect demonstration of separation of powers which is a key tenet in democracy. Although Nixon argued that he enjoyed executive privilege and that the judiciary lacked power to compel him in the exercise of his discretion, the court upheld a decision compelling him to disclose material for evidence. Also, his conduct was investigated by Congress. This shows the separation of powers between the Judiciary, Executive and the Legislature.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Bounded rationality.
Explanation:
Tonya was feeling the effects of bounded rationality. According to Herbert Simon, people’s rationality is limited when making a decision. The rationality is limited by the information the person has, by the cognitive limitations and the time available to make the decision. In this case, if Tonya had been really rational she would have chosen the overseas company. However, she lacked information about shipment and that uncertainty led her to choose the domestic company instead, even if it had many disadvantages.
Answer:These resources, called productive resources, are often classified into three groups: natural resources, human resources, and capital resources. Natural resources (often called land) refer to resources such as coal, water, trees, and land itself. Raw materials used in production come from natural resources.
Answer:
The answer is B, Kim has an external locus of control
Explanation:
in personality psychology, it is identified that people who attribute their success or failure to external circumstance or influence have an external locus of control.
Referring back to the question, at every point, Kim was blaming external influence for his circumstance so we can rightly say he has an external locus of control.
Answer:
Gender pay gap.
Explanation:
One of the problems that Feminism has shown is that inexplicably men and women aren't paid the same amount of money for doing the same job. Resourch proved that women in higher positions also get paid less than the men that there are in lower positions. In that sense, boss women are paid less than worker men.
This difference is often justified for women who participate in part-time jobs and have long absences (due to pregnancy and the cares towards the baby). But this isn't the case for all women. So what are the reasons for this difference, when men and women are working the same and have the same experience? There are many since not hiring women for the maternity leave or paying them less for this, gender stereotypes (that usually is sutil) and the direct discrimination (and when this happen, is easier to report).
In the chart, from 2009, we can see the median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, by sex, race, and ethnicity. This demonstrate that not only for being women get paid less but it can also be for their ethnicity.
In conclusion, this is a problem that isn't resolved and is been studied with many perspectives to see if this is just another type of discrimination against women.
