Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
Answer:
sociology quiz In order to better understand the sorority pledging process at her university for her sociology thesis, Carmen pledges with a popular sorority. This is an example of <u>participant observation</u>.ermine whether their subjects are in the upper class or the upper-middle class
Explanation:
Participant observation is the observation and participation in a group's activities-in its natural setting. It is also known as ethnography, field studies, and/or the vestehen approach.
It is based on grounded theory approach, an approach that develops a theory as data is collected as opposed to being predetermined.
A few examples of those who use participant observation includes : researchers, journalists, and law enforcement.
As in the given scenario, this is an example of <u>participant observation</u>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Before doing a study or conducting a research study with human research participant, it is important for an institutionally designated authority or a body authorized to make decisions to determine whether the proposed study made on the human participant comes under the regulatory requirement or not.
There are several restrictions and laws to be followed when such research studies are made. Therefore it is important for the investigator as well as the institutionally designated authority to check whether such studies comes under the exemption from the regulatory requirements or not.
Hence the answer is true.
I find that chocolate boosts my mood after testing. Its scientifically proven that chocolate makes a person happier. Ever the smell of chocolate brings joy to people!
Answer:
90 cm (10 cm from the weight)
Explanation:
For the meter stick to be in balance, a zero figure on the net torque must be achieved. Torques about the fulcrum may be applied by the mass hanging from the ending of the stick and also by the stick’s initial weight. We utilize the condition that the net torque has to be equal to zero to attain a relationship involving
1) The space amid the left end of the stick and that of the fulcrum
2) the space between the center mass of the stick and that of the fulcrum.
These two distances is expected to add up to a constant.
