Answer:
Collaborative, supportive
Explanation:
Corroborating the president's decision you express your full support through nonverbal communication
Landlords affect animals because depending on what food and water sources are there it could determine whether or not the animal will adapt to that land form
Answer:
The "snapping" of her fingers will have no effect or response in the scenario.
Explanation:
The situation above is related to the concept of "blocking" when it comes to Psychology. According to the<em> "blocking effect,"</em> conditioning to a particular stimulus will only be blocked<u> if that stimulus was reinforced in alignment with a conditioned stimulus before.</u>
So, in the situation above, the snapping of fingers refers to another unconditioned stimulus. Its conditioning was blocked because it was reinforced in compound with the previously conditioned stimulus. This time, the previously unconditioned stimulus<em> </em><em>(poking of Emily's eye</em>) becomes a conditioned stimulus. This is, primarily, because Emily has already gotten the association of the stimuli involved, so she no longer responded in the same manner or it had no more effect on her when her sister mentioned the word "Psychology."
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the are no options attached, we can say the following.
When looking back at the course of her relationship, Helga realized that she has not been happy with her boyfriend's behavior for quite some time. Helga is taking into account the aspect of the social exchange theory known as reciprocity or the expectations of the relationship.
That is why Helga considers that his boyfriend's behavior is not reciprocal to Helga's. Helga was expecting more of her boyfriend but probably his expectations are not the same as Helga's. That is why he seems not to be committed as Helga is. This social exchange theory assumes that people are in a relationship to maximize their satisfaction because relationships produce great gratification.
5/100 = 0.056 sales tax
$12+$26+$125 = $163 total purchase without tax
163*0.056 = 9.128 tax based on how much she bought
$163 + 9.128 = $172.128 total amount she paid (b)