The correct answer is personalization.
This is a type of fallacy where you involve somebody's personality into an argument, even though it is completely unnecessary or wrong to do that. For example, if you are going to a dinner party and you are late, and the dinner is overcooked (completely unrelated to you being late), you might start thinking that it happened because of your tardiness, whereas that is obviously not the case.
Answer:
I
Explanation:
I don't know anything sorry for inconvenience
When the author states "which is a frequent source of controversy in public debates," he is giving us some indication that the information that follows is a source of debate. The debate is that people cannot always agree on what the exact meaning of the amendment is.
Answer:
a , b and d
Explanation:
Groupthink is very valuable practice to promote good decisions through discussions from many points of view, brainstorm, discussions, even conflicts that result in better decisions.
<span>Situational is the answer.
Hope this helps !
Photon</span>