If we look at where it is now, we would have multiplied the x and y values by 1/2. since we are working backwards, lets multiply by 2 instead...giving us the vertex for the pre-image....
J is now (0, -2) multiply by 2
J was (0, -4)
Answer:
Yes, because the slope of the line is closer to 0 than to 1, which indicates a strong association between the variables.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
25 posts
Step-by-step explanation:
So the number of fence post would be the total length of the log divided by the length of each post. As the log is 16m and is corrected to the nearest metre, it could possibly be 16.499m. As for the post that is 70 cm long and corrected to the nearest 10cm, it may as well be 65 cm (or 0.65m) each post
So the max number of fence point once can possibly cut from the log would be
16.499 / 0.65 = 25 posts
Step-by-step explanation:
1. C = the graphing is slowly increasing, then he walks across the top so it is flat
2. D = it started out slow and gradually got higher, which is what the story said
3. H = he had to stop walking, and there is a part of no movement in the graph H
4.