Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
The Olmec is known to be the first major civilization and also one of the earliest known civilization in Meso-America, which was under a dynamic development in the city of Soconusco. The individuals usually lived in the tropical valley on the Gulf of Mexico which nowadays is known as the Veracruz and Tabasco, currently in Mexico. The name Olmec is originated from the Aztec language, meaning the rubber person.
I believe the answer is: <span>personal fable
</span><span>personal fable refers to the personal belief that we had which give us a sense of uniqueness.
</span>This personal fable rarely represent the true event in children life, but children tend to believe them so much to the point where every actions/behavior that they takes may be based on their personal fable.
Answer:
"industry vs. inferiority" stage
Explanation:
Erik Erikson proposed a theory about social and emotional development along people's lifespan. According to him, people go through different stages in life that are manifested as "crisis" where two different options present to the people and they create anxiety. Eventually, the person is inclined towards one of the two options available and solves the crisis and moves on to the next stage.
Erikson's fourth psychosocial crisis, is called "industry vs. inferiority" occurs between the ages of five and twelve.
During this stage, the child feels the need to win approval by demonstrating specific competencies that are valued by society and begin to develop a sense of pride in their accomplishments. When they are reinforced for their initiative they will feel industrious (competent) and confident in their ability to achieve goals. If they are not reinforced, they might feel inferior, doubting their own abilities and not reaching their full potential and can develop a feeling of inferiority.
Sammy is in third grade, so he must be around <u>9 years old,</u> he won the spelling bee and felt proud about it since <u>he demonstrated a specific competency </u>in his school (thus he felt competent), however, <u>when he couldn't complete his arithmetic assignment he felt incompetent </u>(this could case him feelings of inferiority or doubt of his own abilities).
We can see how Sammy is in the "industry vs. inferiority" stage where he's looking to be competent and developing a sense of pride in his accomplishments.
