See electronegativity is the tendency of an atom to gain an electron and flourine with a valecy of one and a vey small size is the most electronegetive because its orbitals are quite closed to the nucleus and hence the attraction is quite strong so it can attract an electron.the question that arises is that some smaller atoms should be more electronegetive as they are closer to the nucleus but it need more energy for them as compared to flourine to complete their octet. now polarity increases when two atoms of quite different sizes form a compound ... the more electronegetive atom will always attract the bond pair forming a negetive charge on it and positive on the less electroneg. one and polarity increases with electronegetivity of the anion.now as your question says
<span>5=I2.. because both the atoms are same there wont be permanent polarity </span>
<span>4=HI iodine is the least electronegetive of all the halogens due to its large size,electronegetivity decreases down the group </span>
<span>3=HBr bromine is the 2nd largest halogen </span>
<span>2=HCl chlorine is the 3rd largest halogen </span>
<span>1=HF fluorine is the smallest halogen making and hence makes the most polar</span>
Answer:
![\mathbf{s =\sqrt [3]{\dfrac{K_{sp}}{4}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7Bs%20%3D%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%5Cdfrac%7BK_%7Bsp%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%7D)
Less than the concentration of Pb2+(aq) in the solution in part ( a )
Explanation:
From the question:
A)
We assume that s to be the solubility of PbI₂.
The equation of the reaction is given as :
PbI₂(s) ⇌ Pb²⁺(aq) + 2I⁻(aq); Ksp = 7 × 10⁻⁹
[Pb²⁺] = s
Then [I⁻] = 2s
![K_{sp} =\text{[Pb$^{2+}$][I$^{-}$]}^{2} = s\times (2s)^{2} = 4s^{3}\\s^{3} = \dfrac{K_{sp}}{4}\\\\s =\mathbf{ \sqrt [3]{\dfrac{K_{sp}}{4}}}\\\\\text{The mathematical expressionthat can be used to determine the value of }\mathbf{s =\sqrt [3]{\dfrac{K_{sp}}{4}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5Ctext%7B%5BPb%24%5E%7B2%2B%7D%24%5D%5BI%24%5E%7B-%7D%24%5D%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20s%5Ctimes%20%282s%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%204s%5E%7B3%7D%5C%5Cs%5E%7B3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7BK_%7Bsp%7D%7D%7B4%7D%5C%5C%5C%5Cs%20%3D%5Cmathbf%7B%20%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%5Cdfrac%7BK_%7Bsp%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctext%7BThe%20mathematical%20expressionthat%20can%20be%20used%20to%20determine%20the%20value%20of%20%20%7D%5Cmathbf%7Bs%20%3D%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%5Cdfrac%7BK_%7Bsp%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%7D)
B)
The Concentration of Pb²⁺ in water is calculated as :
![\mathbf{s =\sqrt [3]{\dfrac{K_{sp}}{4}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7Bs%20%3D%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%5Cdfrac%7BK_%7Bsp%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%7D)
![\mathbf{s =\sqrt [3]{\dfrac{7*10^{-9}}{4}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7Bs%20%3D%5Csqrt%20%5B3%5D%7B%5Cdfrac%7B7%2A10%5E%7B-9%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%7D)
![\mathbf{s} =\sqrt[3]{1.75*10^{-9}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7Bs%7D%20%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B1.75%2A10%5E%7B-9%7D%7D)

The Concentration of Pb²⁺ in 1.0 mol·L⁻¹ NaI




The equilibrium constant:
![K_{sp} =[Pb^{2+}}][I^-]^2 \\ \\ K_{sp} = s*(1.0*2s)^2 =7*1.0^{-9} \\ \\ s = 7*10^{-9} \ \ m/L](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5BPb%5E%7B2%2B%7D%7D%5D%5BI%5E-%5D%5E2%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%20s%2A%281.0%2A2s%29%5E2%20%3D7%2A1.0%5E%7B-9%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20s%20%3D%207%2A10%5E%7B-9%7D%20%5C%20%5C%20%20m%2FL)
It is now clear that maximum possible concentration of Pb²⁺ in the solution is less than that in the solution in part (A). This happens due to the common ion effect. The added iodide ion forces the position of equilibrium to shift to the left, reducing the concentration of Pb²⁺.
Convert grams —> mols and then mols —> atoms
We know that there are 6.02 x 10^23 atoms/mol
And we know that there are about 160 grams of fe2o3 per mol
So (79g fe2o3)/(160 g/mol) = .49 mol fe2o3
Now we use avogadro’s number to do
(.49 mol fe2o3)/(6.02 x 10^23 atoms/mol) = the answer.
I’ll leave the easy math to you.
Answer:
Explanation:
We have in this question the equilibrium
X ( g ) + Y ( g ) ⇆ Z ( g )
With the equilibrium contant Kp = pZ/(pX x pY)
The moment we change the concentration of Y, we are changing effectively the partial pressure of Y since pressure and concentration are directly proportional
pV = nRT ⇒ p = nRT/V and n/V is molarity.
Therefore we can calculate the reaction quotient Q
Qp = pZ/(pX x pY) = 1/ 1 x 0.5 atm = 2
Since Qp is greater than Kp the system proceeds from right to left.
We could also arrive to the same conclusion by applying LeChatelier´s principle which states that any disturbance in the equilibrium, the system will react in such a way to counteract the change to restore the equilibrium. Therefore, by having reduced the pressure of Y the system will react favoring the reactants side increasing some of the y pressure until restoring the equilibrium Kp = 1.