Ask question

Ask question

All categories

1 year ago

13

Kenny is ordering uniforms for both the girls and the boys tennis clubs. He is ordering shirts for 43 players and 2 coaches at a

total cost of 658.35. In addition he is ordering visors for each player at a totsl cost of 368.51. How much will each player pay for the shirt and visor.

2 answers:

iris [78.8K]1 year ago

6 0

Each player pay for the shirt and visor $ 22.82

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Tennis is a game in which two or four players strike a ball with rackets over a net stretched across a court. The usual form (originally called lawn tennis ) is played with a felt-covered hollow rubber ball on a grass, clay, or artificial surface.

Kenny is ordering uniforms for both the girls and the boys tennis clubs. He is ordering shirts for 43 players and 2 coaches at a total cost of 658.35. In addition he is ordering visors for each player at a totsl cost of 368.51. How much will each player pay for the shirt and visor.

There are 45 total shirts and visors needed, for the 43 players and 2 coaches.

So we should divide each of the total costs by 45 , to see how much each individual person pays:

Shirt:

$\frac{658.35}{45} = 14.63$ $ per person

Visor:

$\frac{368.51}{45} = 8.19$ $ per person

Each person is buying a shirt and a visor, so by combine these two prices we get:

$ $14.63$ +$ $8.19$ per person $= 22.82$ $ per person

<h3>Learn more</h3>

Learn more about uniforms brainly.com/question/2544759
Learn more about cost brainly.com/question/4783765
Learn more about tennis brainly.com/question/12185493

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade: 5

Subject: math

Chapter: uniforms

Keywords: uniforms, cost, tennis, shirt, visor, addition

MakcuM [25]1 year ago

5 0

Answer:

Each player pay for the shirt and visor is $23.2 .

Step-by-step explanation:

As given

Kenny is ordering uniforms for both the girls and the boys tennis clubs.

He is ordering shirts for 43 players and 2 coaches at a total cost of $658.35.

Thus

Total number of members for whom shirt are ordering = Total number of players + Total number of coaches

Total number of members for whom shirt are ordering = 43 + 2

= 45

$Cost\ of\ one\ shirt =\frac{Total\ cost\ of\ shirt}{Total\ number\ of\ members\ for\ whom\ shirt\ are\ ordering}$

Putting the values in the above

$Cost\ of\ one\ shirt =\frac{658.35}{45}$

Cost of one shirt = $14.63

As given

In addition Kenny is ordering visors for each player at a totsl cost of $368.51.

$Cost\ of\ one\ visors =\frac{Total\ cost\ of\ visors}{Total\ number\ of\ players}$

Putting the values in the above

$Cost\ of\ one\ visors =\frac{368.51}{43}$

Cost of one visors = $8.57

Thus

Each player pay for the shirt and visor = Cost of one shirt + Cost of one visors

= $14.63 + $8.57

= $ 23.2

Therefore the each player pay for the shirt and visor is $23.2 .

You might be interested in

A gas stove that normally sells for $749 is on sale at a 30% discount. What is the sale price of the gas stove

Virty [35]

The answer is 224.7 you got to turn 30% into decimal which is 0.30
then multiply 0.30 and 749 which equals 224.7

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Three assembly lines are used to produce a certain component for an airliner. To examine the production rate, a random sample of

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

a) Reject H₀

b) [0.31; 3.35]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

a) The objective of this example is to compare if the population means of the production rate of the assembly lines A, B and C. To do so the data of the production of each line were recorded and an ANOVA was run using it.

The study variable is:

Y: Production rate of an assembly line.

Assuming that the study variable has a normal distribution for each population, the observations are independent and the population variances are equal, you can apply a parametric ANOVA with the hypothesis:

H₀ μ₁= μ₂= μ₃

H₁: At least one of the population means is different from the others

Where:

Population 1: line A

Population 2: line B

Population 3: line C

α: 0.01

This test is always one-tailed to the right. The statistic is the Snedecor's F, constructed as the MSTr divided by the MSEr if the value of the statistic is big, this means that there is a greater variance due to the treatments than to the error, this means that the population means are different. If the value of F is small, it means that the differences between populations are not significant ( may differ due to error and not treatment).

The critical region is:

$F_{k-1;n-k; 1-\alpha } = F_{2;15; 0.99} = 6.36$

If F ≥ 3.36, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

Looking at the given data:

$F= \frac{MSTr}{MSEr}$ = 11.32653

With this value the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

Using the p-value method:

p-value: 0.001005

α: 0.01

The p-value is less than the significance level, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

At a level of 5%, there is significant evidence to say that at least one of the population means of the production ratio of the assembly lines A, B and C is different than the others.

b) In this item, you have to stop paying attention to the production ratio of the assembly line A to compare the population means of the production ratio of lines B and C.

(I'll use the same subscripts to be congruent with part a.)

The parameter to estimate is μ₂ - μ₃

The populations are the same as before, so you can still assume that the study variables have a normal distribution and their population variances are unknown but equal. The statistic to use under these conditions, since the sample sizes are 6 for both assembly lines, is a pooled-t for two independent variables with unknown but equal population variances.

t= (X[bar]₂ - X[bar]₃) - ( μ₂ - μ₃) ~t $_{n_2+n_3-2}$

Sa√(1/n₂+1/n₃)

The formula for the interval is:

(X[bar]₂ - X[bar]₃) ± $t_{n_2+n_3-2; 1 - \alpha /2}$ * $Sa\sqrt{*\frac{1}{n_2} + \frac{1}{n_3} }$

$Sa^{2} = \frac{(n_2-1)*S_2^2+ (n_3-1)*S_3^2}{n_2+n_3-2}$

$Sa^{2} = \frac{(5*0.67)+ (5*0.7)}{6+6-2}$

$Sa^{2} = 0.685$

Sa= 0.827 ≅ 0.83

$t_{n_2+n_3-2;1-\alpha /2}= t_{10;0.995} = 3.169$

X[bar]₂ = 43.33

X[bar]₃ = 41.5

(43.33-41.5) ± 3.169 * $*0.83\sqrt{*\frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{6} }$

1.83 ± 3.169 * 0.479

[0.31; 3.35]

With a confidence level of 99% you'd expect that the difference of the population means of the production rate of the assemly lines B and C.

I hope it helps!

8 0

1 year ago

Jimmy made a 15% profit on the sale of a custom designed boat, and the original cost of the boat was $15,000. The boat sold for

Anestetic [448]

If jimmy made a profit of 15% than u would do 15,000 of 15% and that would be 2,250
but that would be Jimmy's profit
Now, what u would do to get how much the boat was sold, than u would do 15,000-2,250
and the answer will be 12,750

6 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

The heat evolved in calories per gram of a cement mixture is approximately normally distributed. The mean is thought to be 100,

Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

A.the type 1 error probability is $\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

B. β = 0.0122

C. β = 0.0000

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mean = 100

standard deviation = 2

sample size = 9

The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

$\mathtt{H_o: \mu = 100}$

$\mathtt{H_1: \mu \neq 100}$

A. If the acceptance region is defined as $98.5 < \overline x > 101.5$ , find the type I error probability $\alpha$ .

Assuming the critical region lies within $\overline x < 98.5$ or $\overline x > 101.5$ , for a type 1 error to take place, then the sample average x will be within the critical region when the true mean heat evolved is $\mu = 100$

∴

$\mathtt{\alpha = P( type \ 1 \ error ) = P( reject \ H_o)}$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P( \overline x < 98.5 ) + P( \overline x > 101.5 )}$

when $\mu = 100$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P \begin {pmatrix} \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} < \dfrac{\overline 98.5 - 100}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \end {pmatrix} + \begin {pmatrix}P(\dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} > \dfrac{101.5 - 100}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \end {pmatrix} }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z < \dfrac{-1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} ) + P(Z > \dfrac{1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z 2.25) }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z$

From the standard normal distribution tables

$\mathtt{\alpha = 0.0122+( 1- 0.9878) })$

$\mathtt{\alpha = 0.0122+( 0.0122) })$

$\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

Thus, the type 1 error probability is $\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

B. Find beta for the case where the true mean heat evolved is 103.

The probability of type II error is represented by β. Type II error implies that we fail to reject null hypothesis $\mathtt{H_o}$

Thus;

β = P( type II error) - P( fail to reject $\mathtt{H_o}$ )

∴

$\mathtt{\beta = P(98.5 \leq \overline x \leq 101.5) }$

Given that $\mu = 103$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{98.5 -103}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \leq \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{n}} \leq \dfrac{101.5-103}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{-4.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} \leq Z \leq \dfrac{-1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(-6.75 \leq Z \leq -2.25) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(z< -2.25) - P(z < -6.75 )}$

From standard normal distribution table

β = 0.0122 - 0.0000

β = 0.0122

C. Find beta for the case where the true mean heat evolved is 105. This value of beta is smaller than the one found in part (b) above. Why?

$\mathtt{\beta = P(98.5 \leq \overline x \leq 101.5) }$

Given that $\mu = 105$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{98.5 -105}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \leq \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{n}} \leq \dfrac{101.5-105}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{-6.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} \leq Z \leq \dfrac{-3.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(-9.75 \leq Z \leq -5.25) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(z< -5.25) - P(z < -9.75 )}$

From standard normal distribution table

β = 0.0000 - 0.0000

β = 0.0000

The reason why the value of beta is smaller here is that since the difference between the value for the true mean and the hypothesized value increases, the probability of type II error decreases.

8 0

2 years ago

What number is 1/10 as great as 7962

Sliva [168]

A number 1/10 as great as 7962 would be 796.2

You get this answer by either dividing 7,962 with 10 which gives you 769.2

Or you can multiply 7,962 with 1/10 to get 7,962/10. If you simplify then you get 796 1/5 or 796.2.

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers