Answer:
Alison wins against Kevin by 0.93 s
Step-by-step explanation:
Alison covers the last 1/4 of the distance in 3 seconds, at a constant acceleration 
, we have the following equation of motion
where s (m) is the total distance, ta = 3 s is the time
Similarly, Kevin overs the last 1/3 of the distance in 4 seconds, at a constant acceleration 
, we have the following equation of motion:
tk = 4 s is the time
Since we can conclude that 
, so Alison would win.
The time it takes for Alison to cover the entire track
The time it takes for Kevin to cover the entire track
So Alison wins against Kevin by 6.93 - 6 = 0.93 s
This means that the bicycle was discounted in total by 60%, so $315 is 40% of the original price to get 40% to 100% youd multiply it by 2.5 so so the same to the price 315 x 2.5= 787.5
<span>Let x = # of rides
Plan A: 10 + 3x
Plan B: 20 + x
if x < 5 rides then plan A is better buy
if x = 5 both plans are the same
if x > 5 then plan B is the best buy
Prove:
x = 6 (rides)
plan A: </span>10 + 3x = 10 + 3(6) = 10+18 = $28
plan B: 20 + x = 20 + 6 = $26
