Answer:
the essential terms of the contract.
Explanation:
Generally contracts that involve large transactions like selling a company must be made in writing and must be signed by all the parties. In this case, the sort of wrote a summary of the basic terms of the sale on the back of an invoice, and at least they signed it. As it is, the contract might not be enforceable because it probably lacks a lot of important details, since the amount of space used to write it down was very small specially considering that most of the space was used for the signatures.
So in order to prevent any future problems, and to comply with the statute of frauds, they should make a written memorandum that includes the essential and important terms of the contract, which must be signed also. They could also write down a proper sales contract since they are signing it again.
The statute of frauds establishes that certain contracts must be done in writing, and since this contract probably involves a significant amount of money, it probably falls under it.
Answer:
$1,840
Explanation:
In order to calculate the Marginal cost of producing the computers in 2nd hour of work, we need to add the marginal cost of computer and marginal cost of wage in the 2nd hour of work.
MC = MC(computers) + MC(wage)
MC = $1,800(w) + $40
MC = $1,840
Working
MC (computers ) = 3 x 600$ = $1,800
hour computers assembled
1st 4
2nd 7
If pam works 2 hours she can assemble 7 computers but she already assembled 4 computers in 1st hour.
So the 2nd-hour computers will be 3 ( 7 - 4) computers.
<span>Setting a rent control price ceiling will cause the same impact as any other price ceiling that is below the market equilibrium price: it will create a shortage in the market. At the price equilibrium of $600, the number of renters would exactly meet the number of available 2 bedroom apartments. However, with this fixed price ceiling, the position along the demand curve will shift to one of higher demand, with no analogous change in the supply curve. Thus there will be more renters than can be supported, and renters will have to look for alternatives and substitutes.</span>
Answer:
Seth's total profits is $1,535.359
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
MC = 0 and we will ignore fixed costs
Therefore TC = 0
Demand function in Santa barbara is
p = 74 - q
MR = 74 - 2q
Since Seth sets different uniform prices in two markets to maximizes his profit therefore
,
MR = MC
74 - 2q = 0
2q = 74
q=37
p = 74 - 37 = 37
Profit = pq - TC
= 37*37 - 0
= $1,369
Inverse demand finction Goleta is
p = 39 - 4q
MR = 39 - 8q
MR = MC
39 - 8q = 0
8q = 39
q = 4.875
p = 39 - 4.875 = 34.125
Profit = pq - TC
= 34.125*4.875 - 0
= $166.359
Therefore, Seth's total profits = $1,369 + $166.359
Seth's total profits= $1,535.359
Seth's total profits is $1,535.359
