<span>2/15 if drawn without replacement.
1/9 if drawn with replacement.
Assuming that the chips are drawn without replacement, there are 6 * 5 different possibilities. And that's a low enough number to exhaustively enumerate them. So they are:
1,2 : 1,3 : 1,4 : 1,5 : 1,6
2,1 : 2,3 : 2,4 : 2,5 : 2,6
3,1 : 3,2 : 3.4 : 3,5 : 3,6
4,1 : 4,2 : 4.3 : 4,5 : 4,6
5,1 : 5,2 : 5.3 : 5,4 : 5,6
6,1 : 6,2 : 6.3 : 6,4 : 6,5
Of the above 30 possible draws, there are 4 that add up to 5. So the probability is 4/30 = 2/15
If the draw is done with replacement, then there are 36 possible draws. Once again, small enough to exhaustively list, they are:
1,1 : 1,2 : 1,3 : 1,4 : 1,5 : 1,6
2,1 : 2,2 : 2,3 : 2,4 : 2,5 : 2,6
3,1 : 3,2 : 3,3 : 3.4 : 3,5 : 3,6
4,1 : 4,2 : 4.3 : 4,4 : 4,5 : 4,6
5,1 : 5,2 : 5.3 : 5,4 : 5,5 : 5,6
6,1 : 6,2 : 6.3 : 6,4 : 6,5 : 6,6
And of the above 36 possibilities, exactly 4 add up to 5. So you have 4/36 = 1/9</span>
Answer: B) The heights of girls who live on a certain street in the city of Buffalo
Every answer choice starts with "the heights of all 14-year-old girls who", so we can ignore that part. Choice A describes the largest population while choice B describes the smallest population. In other words, choice A is very general and broad, while choice B is very specific and narrow. The more specific you get and the smaller the population is, the less likely its going to be normally distributed.
<u>Solution-</u>
The atmospheric pressure at sea level = 14.7 lb/in²
Pressure gets reduced by half for each 3.6 miles we move up.
Taking,
x = miles above the sea-level
y = pressure in lb/in²
0 14.7
3.6 7.35
7.2 3.675
10.8 1.8375
It can be observed that both the variables are in inverse proportion as the distance from sea-level increase the pressure decreases.
As only the second graph satisfies the points and inverse proportional condition, so that is the correct graph.
By plotting the graph in excel taking these data set, the following plot was obtained.
If quarterly shrinkage (every 3 months) is 2.5%, then multiplying by $875,495 gives a value of 21887.38, or an average monthly shrinkage of 21887.38 / 3 = $7,295.79.For an employee to monitor the CCTV, it would cost ($7.5/h)(11 h/d)(30 d/m) = $2,475/month. Therefore, it is much cheaper (around 2/3 cheaper) to have an employee monitor CCTV rather than to allow the high shrinkage rate.
