Here it is given that AB || CD
< EIA = <GJB
Now
∠EIA ≅ ∠IKC and ∠GJB is ≅ ∠ JLD (Corresponding angles)
∠EIA ≅ ∠GJB then ∠IKC ≅ ∠ JLD (Substitution Property of Congruency)
∠IKL + ∠IKC 180° and ∠DLH + ∠JLD =180° (Linear Pair Theorem)
So
m∠IKL + m∠IKC = 180° ....(1)
But ∠IKC ≅ ∠JLD
m∠IKC = m∠JLD (SUBTRACTION PROPERTY OF CONGRUENCY)
So we have
m∠IKL + m∠JLD = 180°
∠IKL and ∠JLD are supplementary angles.
But ∠DLH and ∠JLD are supplementary angles.
∠IKL ≅ ∠DLH (CONGRUENT SUPPLEMENTS THEOREM)
Answer:
A Type II error is when the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected even when the alternative hypothesis is true.
In this case, it would represent that the new program really increases the pass rate, but the sample taken is not enough statistical evidence to prove it. Then, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
The consequence is that the new method would be discarded (or changed) eventhough it is a real improvement.
Step-by-step explanation:
(burn time)/(8 h) = (21 cm)/(14 cm)
burn time = (8 h)*(21/14)
burn time = 12 h
Elio expects the 21 cm candle to burn 12 hours.
