Answer:
The answer is a sense of inferiority.
Explanation:
According to Erikson's structure of psychosocial development, Daryl is probably at stage four, called Industry vs. Inferiority. During this stage, which appears around age five, children will have the chance to prove their competencies: learning to write, do basic math and develop artistic talent.
When the children's effort is encouraged, they will probably achieve a sense of industry (competency). Failure to do this might result in a sense of inferiority.
Answer:
The conflict theorist would argue from the point of view of the society being in perpetual competition as a result of inequality of distribution of resources and power. The rich would not pave the way for cheaper technology as a result of them purchasing early version of expensive technologies but rather, everyone would aspire to be the first to buy such early version of technology due to prestige associated with it.
On the long run, the conflict theorists makes more sense due to the fact that, as more people aspire to buy the early version of technologies, it creates extraordinary demand for the goods. this would force the manufacturers to employ more workers inorder to meet up with the demand thereby leading to fall in the prices of such goods. An example is the Toyota brand cars that is popular in some countries.
Explanation:
An uncommon, unexpected, or an individual drug response thought to result from a genetic predisposition is called idiosyncratic reaction. These are also called type B reactions. They are side effects that happens rarely and mostly cannot be predicted. One example is an asthma attack due to the reaction to aspirin.
Answer:
sex typed work
Explanation:
George Murdock (1937) surveyed 324 societies around the world and found every society associates a certain kind of work with one sex or another. However, activities considered feminine in one society may be considered masculine in others. The only exception to this was metal working, which was always a male dominated profession. His conclusion was that gendered work is not biological but cultural..