Based on the statement above, Dr. Whiren’s research best
aligns with the perspective theory of Lev Vygotsky. Lev Vygotsky is a
psychologist who has developed a sociocultural approach in regards to cognitive
development because he stresses about fundamental role of a person’s social
interaction.
<span>Which of the following is an example of the investigatory powers of congress?
</span>
<span>d. gathering information useful in making legislative decisions
</span>
Answer:
Structuralists
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this technique is mostly used by Structuralists. This school of thought focuses on the methodology that implies elements of human culture must be understood by way of their relationship to a broader, overarching system or structure.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
she creates a positive externality for Kara and a negative externality for Susie
Explanation:
Susie lives in a dorm and likes to play loud music in her room. Her neighbor Kara enjoys the same type of music and gets pleasure from Susie turning up the music. Her other neighbor, Alex, can't stand Susie's music and gets mad when she turns it up for all to hear. When Susie plays her music loudly, she creates <u>a positive externality for Kara and a negative externality for Susie</u>. Externalities are defined as the cost or benefit affecting an individual who is not directly involved in an activity such as the production of a good or the rendering of a service. Externalities can be positive if an individual benefits from the activity. That the effect of the activity on a third party is beneficial such as Kara who benefits/enjoys Susie's music and externalities can also be negative if the activity is detrimental to the individual such as Alex who is uncomfortable with Susie's loud music.
Answer:
C) For these white Americans, Lincoln was a member of their racial in-group, whereas an Asian American would be a member of an out-group.
Explanation:
This example is a very common example of racial or ethical double standards. <u>Something that is seen as preferable and acceptable for one group is considered as an undesirable trait for another. </u>
One group's traits are judged differently than the same trait in another group - like saving money in the context of white people is a good trait, while saving money when it comes to Asians is seen as being stingy, just because they are different, outsiders and expected to behave like that based on racial stereotypes and prejudices. <u>This makes the members of one group more prone to the evaluation of their behavior, harder to adapt and more likely to be judged even if they show preferable traits. </u>
