answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
2 years ago
14

Huxley Building Supplies' last free cash flow was $1.75 million. Its free cash flow growth rate is expected to be constant at 25

% for 2 years, after which free cash flows are expected to grow at a rate of 6% forever. Its weighted average cost of capital WACC is 12%. Huxley has $5 million in short-term investments and $7 million in debt and has 1 million shares outstanding. What is the best estimate of the current intrinsic stock price?
Business
1 answer:
Kipish [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Ans. The best estimate of the current intrinsic stock price is $36.51

Explanation:

Hi, first, we have to determine the cash flows for year 1 and 2 (when the stock grows at 25%) and then, the terminal value (using the constant growth rate of 6%). Then we have to bring to present value all the cash flows (terminal value included) and since the terminal value is an amount of money expressed in dollars of year 2, we have to bring it to present value, discounted at the WACC.

Normally, we need to use the rate of return of the equity but in this case this is not possible due to the lack of information. What we can do is to find the value of the company´s equity, which means that If we bring to present value tha cash flows of year 1 and 2 and the terminal value (using thte WACC as a discount rate) and add the short term invesments and substract the debt of the company, we can find the equity´s value and divide it by the outstanding shares, therefore obtaining a good aproximation to the intrinsic value of the stock. It all goes like this.

Note. Notice that 1.75 millions were the last cash flow so we need to find the cash flow for year 1 (CF1)

(PV)CF1=\frac{1.75(1+0.25)}{(1+0.12)^{1} } =1.9531

(PV)CF2=\frac{1.75(1+0.25)^{2} }{(1+0.12)^{2} } =1.9463

(P.V)Terminal Value=\frac{1.75(1+0.25)^{2}(1+0.06) }{(0.12-0.06)} *(\frac{1}{(1+0.12)^{2} } )=38.51

Where (PV) means present value.

Now, let´s do the following operation

EquityValue=(PV)allCashFlows+ShortTermInvest-Debt

EquityValue=(1.9531+1.9463+38.51)+5-7=36.51

Then, the equity´s value is $36.51 millions.

Now, the intrinsic value of the stock is the value of its equity divided by the number of outstanding shares.

Intrinsic ValueStock=\frac{36.51}{1} =36.51

So, the intrinsic value of Huxley Building Supplies' is $36.51

Best of luck.

You might be interested in
Yakov orders 40 cases of mescal from a Mexican distributor at a price of $90 per case. 2. A U.S. company sells 200 spark plugs t
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

8 0
2 years ago
Your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB). You agree that this stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrat
g100num [7]

Complete question:

Assume that your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB), which he thinks has very little risk.  You agree that the stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrate that his risk would be even lower if he were more diversified.  You obtain the following returns data for West Coast Bank (WCB).  Both banks have had less variability than most other stocks over the past 5 years.  

                   Year               ECB                WCB  

               2004             40.00%            40.00%

               2005            -10.00%            15.00%

               2006             35.00%            -5.00%

               2007             -5.00%           -10.00%

               2008             15.00%            35.00%

a. What is the expected return and risk of each stock?

b. Measured by the standard deviation of returns, by how much would your uncle's risk have been reduced if he had held a portfolio consisting of 60% in ECB and the remainder in WCB?  In other words, what is the difference between portfolio's standard deviation and weighted average of components' standard deviations? (Hint: check the example on page 11-12 on my note).

Solution:

The estimated return of the stock is the average profit.

So the average of ECB is (40-10+35-5+15)/5

=  \frac{75 percent}{5}

= 15% expected return

WCB expected return = 40+15-5-10+35  

= \frac{75 percent}{5}

= 15%

They've had the same planned return.

This is generally defined in the Greek letter Mu, (U) A weighted average may also be used to calculate portfolio volatility.

Standard deviation of ECB is \sqrt{{ sum [(x-U)^2]/5}}

so for ECB:

(40-15)^2= 25^2 =6.25%

(-10-15)^2= -35^2 = 0.1225

(35-15)^2= 20^2 = 0.04

(-5-15)^2= -20^2 = 0.04

(15-15)^2=0

now 0.0625+0.1225+0.04+0.04+0=0.265

stdev= \sqrt{(0.265/5)} = 0.23

So WCB is the same except in a different order to make things quick I'm only going to add the median again WCB=0.23

Then the 60/40 portfolio will be the "weighted average" of the returns.

portfolio returns

2004: (60%*40%)+(40%*40%) = 40%

2005: (60%*-10%)+(40%*15%) = 0%

2006: (60%*35%)+(40%*-5%) = 19%

2007: (60%*-5%)+(40%*-10%) = -7%

2008:(60%*15%)+(40%*35%) = 23%

we have an average return of (40+19-7+23)/5 = 75/5 =15%  

The estimated return of all combined stocks is a better way to do so.

we knew they both had expected returns of 15% so we can say  

(60%*15%)+(40%*15%)=15%  so the portfolio has an expected return of 15%

Now we do the standard deviation for the whole portfolio and get

(40-15)^2= 25^2 =6.25%

(0-15)^2 = - 25^2 =6.25%

(19-15)^2= 4^2 = 0.16%

(-7-15)^2 = -22^2 = -4.84%

(23-15)^2= 8^2 = 0.64%

now add them up and get 9.78%

\sqrt{(9.78%/5)} = 13.98%

Therefore, the normal portfolio variance is 13.98 per cent and the predicted portfolio return is 15 per cent.

Every stock has a standard deviation of 23 per cent and an average return of 15 per cent, meaning that the fund has the same estimated return but with less standard deviation. This ensures that the same gain is less costly. It's stronger than any of these products.

5 0
2 years ago
Gillette now markets its Body line of razors, blades, and shaving gels for "manscaping," the art of shaving body hair in areas b
Varvara68 [4.7K]

The correct answer for the question is option"b", changing the value offered to the customers.

Explanation:

Gillete's strategy is to increase the utility of the product to the customers by making it usable for a variety of purposes. By making the products "manscaped" the products can be used for removing the hair below the neck line. Thus, the company is trying to offer better value to the customers. the value addition is in the form of improved utility for a variety of purposes. Customers will gain better value for the price they are paying for the product.

7 0
2 years ago
Decision Point: Your Final Meeting: RC Helicopter Piloting Radio controlled helicopter Your next client is Alan, who runs a high
hoa [83]

Answer:

Leave the price alone. Although it may lack some of the features that competitors’ models have, the Boss brand is well-recognized and well-respected in the market

Explanation:

You chose to lower the price to $359.That was the best choice.During the maturity stage of the product life cycle, increased competition eventually forces price cutting, and market share leadership may outweigh profit as a pricing objective, so this is a good option. However, it would take some research to determine whether the company can still make a profit at this price.

8 0
2 years ago
Kimberly-Clark developed its Avert Virucidal tissues that contained vitamin C derivatives, which were scientifically designed to
mezya [45]

Answer:

E) incomplete market and product protocol.

Explanation:

Kimberly-Clark's Avert Virucidal failed in test marketing, because the researchers in charge of product development  failed to clearly define how it would satisfy consumers' wants and needs. The idea itself wasn't bad, but the concept testing was poorly done. During concept testing, the marketing researchers must determine if the consumers understand the product's idea or not, and obviously that didn't happen. The product does satisfy consumers' needs and if the marketing process was properly done, they would have probably accepted the product.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1. Acme Company just had a very successful IPO. Initial shares sold at a price far above their realistic value. The “buzz” on th
    8·1 answer
  • At a busy meeting of the international sprout growers, you want to make contact with as many people as possible. luckily, you re
    5·1 answer
  • A(n) ____ goal for a waste management plant could be to "identify barriers to recycling as well as means to overcome those barri
    15·1 answer
  • Edith's warehouse (adjusted basis of $450,000) is destroyed by a hurricane in October 2019. Edith, a calendar year taxpayer, rec
    13·1 answer
  • A company that is at a disadvantage in the marketplace because it lacks competitively valuable resources possessed by rivals Mul
    10·1 answer
  • Mittelstaedt Inc., buys 60 percent of the outstanding stock of Sherry, Inc. Sherry owns a piece of land that cost $223,000 but h
    9·1 answer
  • Exchange rates are 120 yen per dollar, 0.8 euro per dollar, and 10 pesos per dollar. A bottle of beer in New York costs 6 dollar
    10·1 answer
  • Imagine that you are a management coach and one of your clients, a new manager, says, "I’ve heard that about two thirds of manag
    13·1 answer
  • On January 2, 2018, Hernandez, Inc. signed a 10-year noncancelable lease for a heavy duty drill press. The lease stipulated annu
    14·1 answer
  • Shaan and Anita currently insure their cars with separate companies, paying $650 and $575 a year. If they insure both cars with
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!