Given
One month julia collected 8.4 gallons of rainwater.
she used 5.2 gallons of rainwater to water her garden
6.5 gallons of rainwater to water flowers
Find out how much was the supply of rainwater increased or decreased by the end of the month.
To proof
As given in the question
One month julia collected 8.4 gallons of rainwater
she used 5.2 gallons of rainwater to water her garden and 6.5 gallons of rainwater to water flowers
Total water she used in the month = 5.2 gallons + 6.5gallons
= 11.7 gallons
Let the supply of rainwater increased or decreased by the end of the month
be x .
Than the equation become in the form
x + 8.4 = 11.7
x = 3.3 gallons
Therefore the supply of rainwater increased or decreased by the end of the month is 3.3 gallons.
Hence proved
One way to solve the system is to <u>substitute</u> a variable.
<u>Explanation:</u>
One approach to solve an equation is by substitution of one variable. Right now, a condition for one factor, at that point substitute that arrangement in the other condition, and explain. All value(s) of the variable(s) that fulfills a condition, disparity, arrangement of conditions, or arrangement of imbalances.
The technique for tackling "by substitution" works by settling one of the conditions (you pick which one) for one of the factors (you pick which one), and afterward stopping this go into the other condition, "subbing" for the picked variable and fathoming for the other. At that point you back-explain for the principal variable.
Answer:
Option b
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a researcher measures IQ and weight for a group of college students.
In general, we think that the weight has nothing to do with IQ of a person and hence not correlated.
But if we go deep, we find that after a certain weight, the person becomes lazy and inactive with a chance to have reduced IQ
Weight gain causes also health problems including less activity of both brain and body and hence there is a chance for less IQ
So we find that as weight increases iq decreases and when weight decreases, IQ increases.
Thus we can say that there is a negative correlation but not necessarily near to one.
Hence option b is right
Answer:
Then the minimum sample size in order to satisfy the condition of 0.1 for the margin of error is 97 and since the sample used is n =100 we can conclude that is sufficient and the best answer would be:
D. Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. We know that we require a 95% of confidence, our significance level would be given by 
and 
. And the critical value would be given by:
The margin of error for the proportion interval is given by this:
(a)
We want a margin of error of 
and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:
(b)
Since we don't have prior info for the population proportion we can use as estimator the value of 0.5. And replacing into equation (b) the values from part a we got:
Then the minimum sample size in order to satisfy the condition of 0.1 for the margin of error is 97 and since the sample used is n =100 we can conclude that is sufficient and the best answer would be:
D. Yes.
Answer:
e.) The survey is meaningless because of nonresponse bias.
Step-by-step explanation:
