<u>Answer:
</u>
The novel insight that Mencius brought to Confucius’ thought was that human nature is essentially and innately good.
Option: (C)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The entire faith or the religion of Confucianism is based on the thought of the goodness of human nature and the significance of virtue in human life.
 - Mencius, a renowned Confucian philosopher, proposed that human nature is originally good and is only subjected to contamination due to external influences.
 - He also stated that human nature can be perfected by inculcating virtue on the minds of people.
 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Hello. Unfortunately you did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if the text it refers to is read. In this text, you should look for the moment that shows the incident at the mosque and analyze why the way Adnan behaved in that incident was so disturbing and uncomfortable for the people present at the place. This behavior should be linked to the motives that led Adnan to be accused of murder, where you will see if his behavior is related to the charge, making it easier to show that Adnan is guilty of the charges he receives.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Based on the given scenario above, the one who is most likely to be hired on the job is Carl because Carl is someone who is responsible and thoughtful in the way he do things and by that, he could be someone who is more approachable than Aaron who resorts to being strict and his main focus is only on winning.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The thick mud felt as if-<u>dirt got wet</u>
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
This outcome would be known as a <u>ceiling effect.</u>
In psychology, the ceiling effect is when a test establishes a range too low for measuring certain variable, that is to say, is when the upper limit (ceiling) of the test is too low, inadequate and not enough for the participants that the test is evaluating. 
In this case, the participants are supposed to respond differently since some played violent video games for 5 minutes and other group played for 25 minutes. Since the outcome was that the majority were rated as "very aggressive", it's an indicator that they weren't tested adequately: the range was low, and therefore, it made it easier for some participants to get the score "very aggressive".