If <u>quadrilaterals</u> WXYZ and BADC are <u>congruent</u>, then their corresponding <u>sides</u> are congruent.
Given that
you can state that
If AD = 4 cm and AB = 6 cm, then WZ = 4 cm and YZ = 6 cm. Opposite rectangle sides are congruent, then XY = 4 cm and WX = 6 cm.
The perimeter of WXYZ is
P = WX + XY + YZ + WZ = 6 + 4 + 6 + 4 = 20 cm.
Answer: 20 cm
The variable is Quantitative, has Interval level of measurement.
Variables which can be quantified & expressed numerically are Quantitative variables. Eg : as given , price
Variables which cant be qualified & expressed numerically are Qualitative variables. Eg : level of honesty, loyalty etc
Nominal & Ordinal are qualitative variables : signifying yes or no to a category (like men or women) , or ranks (x better than y) respectively. So price level is not such categorical & ordinal ratio.
Quantitative ratio variables are with reference to time , or are in forms of rate (like speed , growth per year). So, price level is not such ratio variable also.
Price is a quantitative variable, in which the ranking, its difference can be calculated. This is characteristic of a <u>Quantitative Interval Variable</u>.
Let the be the time in hours, and meters of fencing completed.
We know that After three hours, they have 15 meters of fencing complete, our graph will go from the point (0,0) to the point (3,15). We also know that they decide to take a 2-hour break for lunch and then resume building the fence, so our graph will go from the point (3,15) to the the point (5,15). Finally, After four more hours, they have a fence that is a total of 55 meters long, so the final part of our graph will go from the point (5,15) to the point (9,55)
We can conclude that the graph of t vs y is:
12 1/2 cups (2 1/2 x 5= 12 1/2)
Please mark me brainliest!
Answer:
The value of the printer on the first year was $ 23,750.00. On the second year it was $ 22,562.5. On the third year it was $ 21,434.38.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the printer depreciates at a rate of 5% per year, I believe the stated equation is miss typed. Therefore I'll answer this with the correct equation that would represent that setting:
In the first year the value of the printer is:
On the second year the value of the printer is:
On the third year the value of the printer is:
The value of the printer on the first year was $ 23,750.00. On the second year it was $ 22,562.5. On the third year it was $ 21,434.38.
