Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Pilar is stating the obvious when she makes the remark since we presume two things: In first place, if she were not commenting on his/her work she would have made that remark at the beginning, which makes this statement redundant. In second place, if she were giving suggestions about how to improve the person's work, she might be trying to be polite to the client.
Pilar should have avoided saying the phrase because she either being redundant, the first scenario, or saying something inaccurate in order to b polite, as in the second scenario. As a general rule, stating something implicitly negative and even vague at the end of a comment usually confuses the recipient of the message, who has to imagine the possible meaning of that statement.
Answer: Ideal type
Explanation:
An ideal type is used by sociologist to carry out a sample of an event or an occasion, the emphasis is to stress certain elements common to many cases of a given phenomenon. This is the test the sociologist is about carrying out by the exercise he gave to the students.
Answer and Explanation
• Marx and Engels never expressed admiration for the bourgeoisie and capitalism because their ideas where describing it as an exploitative system that benefited the owners of the means of productions than the workforce. These individuals created a Communist Manifesto that provided a deep analysis of capitalism, a progress of how to overthrow it and a plan for its replacement by a communists society.
• Marx and Engels expresses antagonism and rejection towards the bourgeoisie and capitalism because they argued that the system mercilessly exploit the proletariat. In his explanation, Marx identified the emergency of a new industrial society that creates unequal relationships between the various social classes. Marx believed this disparity was breeding hostility between two important classes in the society.
• They both believed that the system was a seed of destruction because the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the works of the proletariat. They both described that the surplus value created by workers was more than the wages that produced high profits for the owners of capital. They both predicted the end of modern factor system as a revolution where workers will rise up and take control of the system that exploited them.
The answer is “both saw it as a necessary response to the privileges of royalty and aristocrats”
Though both agreed that Revolution was necessary in France against royalty and aristocrats, what Washington an Jefferson disagreed on was American intervention to aid the French Revolution. Jefferson felt the United States owed France aid in war since after the French had aided in the American Revolution they signed a treaty promising to provide aid if France then after went to war. Washington on the other hand felt that their obligation to the treaty had been terminated since the king whom they signed the treaty with was now dead, and he did not otherwise think it would be a good idea to engage Americans in the French Revolution because he worried that it would not only be too expensive for the newly formed nation but would also cost too many American lives
(Sorry for the unsolicited history lesson, oh well, maybe it’ll help you with later questions)
