answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
1 year ago
13

Brett’s teacher observed Brett’s behavior in class for a week and compared the minutes he stayed on task in class to the grade h

e earned on the homework that night. She found that the correlation coefficient was r = 0.97. What type of relationship has his teacher discovered?
positive correlation, likely causal positive correlation, not likely causal negative correlation, likely causal negative correlation, not likely causal
Mathematics
2 answers:
zhenek [66]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

<em><u /></em>

  • <em><u>positive correlation, likely causal </u></em>

Explanation:

Correlation and causation are different.

Correlation means that the variables are related, meaning that when one changes the other also change. A positive correlation means that the variables change in the same way: when one increases the other also increases, and when one decreases the other also decreases. A negative correlation means that the variables change in opposite directions, i.e. when one increases the other decreases.

The correlations may be strong, moderated or weak. The correlation coefficient tells how strong the correlation is. The correlation coefficient may take values from - 1 to + 1.

A negative 1 correlation coefficient means a perfect negative correlation. A positive 1 correlation coefficient means a perfect positive correlation. Thus, in this case Brett's teacher found that the correlation coefficent was r = 0.97. That is pretty close to 1, and means that this is a strong positive correlation.

About causation, you only may feature a relationship as causal if one variable is the reason why the other variable changed in the way it did it. In this case, it is very reasonable to attribute a causation relationship between the minutes Brett stayed on task in class and the grade he earned on the homework that night, because the more Brett worked in class the better prepared he should be to do his homework, and that idea is reinforced by the high positive correlation coefficient r = 0.97. That is why you can assert that the teacher must have discored a positive correlation, likely causal.

mihalych1998 [28]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

positive correlation, likely causal

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
A bakery sells rolls in units of a dozen. The demand X (in 1000 units) for rolls has a gamma distribution with parameters α = 3,
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

The value  is  E(X) =  \$ 1.7067

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  parameters  are  α = 3, θ = 0.5

    The cost of making a unit on the first day  is  c = $2

    The selling price of a  unit on the first day is  s = $5

    The selling price of a leftover unit on the second day is  v  = $ 1

Generally the profit of a unit on the first day is

        p_1 = 5 - 2

           p_1 = \$3

The profit of a unit on the second day is

       p_2 = 1 - 2

=>     p_2 = - \$1

Generally the probability of making profit greater than $ 1 is mathematically represented as

    P(X >  1 ) = Gamma (X ,\alpha , \theta)

=>   P(X >  1 ) = Gamma (1 ,3 , 0.5)

Now from the gamma distribution table  we have that

    P(X >  1 ) =  0.67668

Generally the probability of making profit less than or  equal to  $ 1 is mathematically represented as

       P(X \le  1 ) = 1 - P(X >  1 )

=>     P(X \le  1 ) = 1 - 0.67668

=>     P(X \le  1 ) = 0.32332    

So  the probability of making  $3  is    P(X >  1 ) =  0.67668

and  the probability of making  -$1  is   P(X \le  1 ) = 0.32332  

Generally the value of profit per day is mathematically represented as

      E(X) =  3 *  P(X >  1 )   +   (-1  *  P(X \le 1 ) )

=>     E(X) =  3 * 0.67668   +   (-1  *  0.32332 )

=>     E(X) =  \$ 1.7067

4 0
1 year ago
Miguel ran for 850 meters and then walked for 2.75 kilometers.
olga55 [171]

Answer:

1900 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

He ran for 850 meters

Walked for 2.75 kilometers, and that's 2.75 * 1000 meters, which is 2750 meters

The total he walked more than he ran is 2750 - 850 = 1900 meters

4 0
1 year ago
Lin counts 5 bacteria under a microscope. She counts them again each day for four days, and finds
svetlana [45]

Answer:

Yes, but it is not linear. It is exponential :  f(x) = 5\cdot 2^{x-1}

Step-by-step explanation:

On the first day we have 5 bacteria.

On the second day we will have 5*2 = 10 bacteria.

On the third day we will have 10*2 = 5*2*2 = 5*2^2 = 20 bacteria.

On the fourth day we will have 20*2 = 5*2*2*2 = 5*2^3 = 40 bacteria.

We can see that

                                                f(x) = 5\cdot 2^{x-1},

where x is a number of days and f(x) gives us the number of bacteria.

4 0
1 year ago
The graph shows the cost of a lunch in a school’s cafeteria since school started.
max2010maxim [7]

Answer: It's slope is zero

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Let S(x) denote "x has a good attitude," where the domain is the set of people in the class. Express the negation of the proposi
user100 [1]

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember, we have two quantifiers, the existential quantifier ∃, and the universal quantifier ∀. The existential ∃ translates to English as "for some" or "there exists", whereas ∀ means "for all" or "every". We will also use the negation operator ¬.

First, let's write the proposition using quantifiers. "There is someone in this class who does not have a good attitude" translates to "(∃x)(¬S(x))". ∃x means that there exists a person in this class x. ¬S(x) means that x, the person that exists because of the quantifier, does not have a good attitude.

The negation is "¬(∃x)(¬S(x))" or equivalently "(∀x)(S(x))". To negate a proposition using quantifiers, change the quantifier (existential to universal and viceversa) and negate the predicate (in this case we negated ¬S(x)).

In English, "(∀x)(S(x))" means "Every person in this class has a good attitude".

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • the area of the hartstein's kitchen is 182 square feet. this is 20% of the area of the first floor of their house. let f represe
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement about the point (2, 0) is true?
    9·2 answers
  • Diagonal cross-section of a sphere produces which two dimensional shape
    14·1 answer
  • Tessa had $90 in her checking account. She paid her cable/internet bill for $60. She deposited $50 from her part-time job before
    13·2 answers
  • Mandy begins cycling west at 30 miles per hour at 11a.M. If Liz leaves from same point 20 minutes later bicycling west at 36 mph
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose that, for every lot of 100 computer chips a company produces, an average of 1.4 are defective. Another company buys many
    11·1 answer
  • After constructing a confidence interval estimate for a population mean, you believe that the interval is useless because it is
    5·1 answer
  • Rewrite the proportion 7:21 = 3:9 as a proportion using fractions.
    12·2 answers
  • Canteen A, canteen B and Canteen C repeat their lunch means every 12 days, 8days and 10 days respectively. All three canteens se
    6·1 answer
  • The baker fits 26 rolls onto a pan that measures 1 5/ 8 ft.² how many square feet does the Baker use for each roll? Show your wo
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!