Answer:
• Under U.S. GAAP, companies recognize deferred tax assets and then reduce those assets with an offsetting valuation allowance if its is not more likely than not that the asset will be realized.
• Under IFRS, deferred tax assets only are recognizefd to begin with if its is probable (defined as '' more likely than not'') that they will be realized.
Explanation:
A deferred tax asset occurs when taxes are either been overpaid or there's an advance payment for them. In this scenario, they're not yet acknowledged in the income statement.
Valuation allowance is a reserve used by a business to offset the deferred tax asset. The statements that are true about the valuation allowance are:
• Under U.S. GAAP, companies recognize deferred tax assets and then reduce those assets with an offsetting valuation allowance if its is not more likely than not that the asset will be realized.
• Under IFRS, deferred tax assets only are recognizefd to begin with if its is probable (defined as '' more likely than not'') that they will be realized.
Answer:Only statements 1 and 2 are correct
Explanation: An effective team involves people who interact with each other to accomplish certain goals or meet certain needs. Team members work intensely with each other to achieve a specific, common goal or objective. This therefore attracts other people to them, that is magnetism. In as much as they look out to achieve their goals, they are also interested in others' success.
Answer:
Almost every other business in this universe now relies upon group thinking rather than individual approach to anything.
It has several advantages, some of them are pointed out below:
o) Equality bias, when there are group discussion, this means that everyone has a part of say in the final decision and that leads to equality bias, which is beneficial.
o) More alternatives are generated, it is a fact that when an individual takes a decision, he/she is neglecting a lot of other options to explore which could be a lot beneficial for the business.
o) More acceptance of the final decision, Since the final decision taken is with the approval and consent of everyone, there is a possibility that the final decision will be more acceptable.
o) Lastly, It creates Synergy, synergy is the idea that a decision as a whole is better than in parts.
Hope this helps you. Good Luck.
This is an Affirming the Consequent argument. It is the name
of an invalid conditional argument form or an invalid form of the modus ponens.
This is easily identified by remembering that any argument
that affirms the consequent is invalid.
Answer:
easement was created of necessity
Explanation:
In the situation being described the easement was created of necessity. An easement of necessity refers to the right of an individual to use the property of another due to there being no access to a public right of way to and from the individual's own property, just like in this scenario. Since Jim has no other way of getting to and from his home then he has a necessity of passing through his neighbor's property.
