I believe the answer is: Will the researcher have collaborators at the research site abroad?
Ethical standard requires researchers to had a method to communicate with local language if the researches are conducted in foreign countries. Collabolators could be filled with external teams that able to interpret both languages, which would be deemed as sufficient by IRB.
<span>A list of statements is not proved, but Sheila is definitely conducting an experiment. An experiment consists of someone coming up with a hypothesis and then testing to see if the hypothesis is true. Likely, she will take cups of water with varying levels of salt. Then, she will float the same object in the water, and measure its buoyancy to determine the density.</span>
Answer:
All job applicants who were rejected had fewer qualifications than those accepted.
Explanation:
In this example, we learn that Supremo Company has a clear gender inbalance when it comes to its employees. Out of twenty senior executives, only one is a woman, and out of forty junior executives, only five are female. This shows that a lot more men than women are given jobs at the company.
If Supremo wants to defend itself against the charges of sexual discrimination, it has to show that the imbalance is justified based on the qualifications of applicants. This will show that the employees were chosen due to their talent, and not their gender. Therefore, one way to show this would be by demonstrating that all job applicants who were rejected had fewer qualifications than those who were accepted.
Answer: All-or-nothing thinking
Explanation: Jarl has made some mistakes and so he thinks that he has to be perfect to be smart. This is the all idea if he misses any then he is stupid which is the nothing thinking. Hopefully this helps!
Answer:
The correct response is option D: Determining if rival hypotheses or alternative explanations for finding might be possible.
Explanation:
A research design describes the research methods and techniques that the researcher used to collect their data. The research design should explain why the research methods are suitable for the subject matter. Examining the validity of a research design is done so that the credibility of the researcher can be established and so the readers and fellow scholars can assess for themselves if the study was carried out rigorously or whether there may be some limitations in the data. The researcher needs to list any known threats to validity and they should also explain to what extent the findings are generalizable.
