Answer:
C. If consumers are informed about products, prices, and costs across countries
D. If consumers are particularly important to the seller
YES. As having a complete information will allow for arbitrage between areas and if they are a big fish of the seller business the seller will be less likely to roll-over the consumer in negociation.
Explanation:
A. If switching to competing brands or substitutes is expensive
NO. If switching is expenses then, the exit-barrier is higer thus, less bargaining power as we are less likely to leave
E. If consumer demand is rising
NO. Is demand rises then the supplier will have bargain power as it has where to sale the product if we leave
Answer: A. A QR code that is scanned and decodes information directly on the phone
Explanation:
This is the best option as QR codes are usually inserted into print media to give more information about something when they are scanned. They can even be used to give discounts.
Human technology has not reached the point where either pop-ups, interactive content, or image projections can appear on print media so options B through E are wrong.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Yes, if the old steering wheel would have damaged the boat.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case presented Joel's brother seems to be quite pleasent with the fact that Joel is repairing the boat once year so that means that he does not need to take the boat in for regular maintenance so therefore that he saves money due to the work done by Joel. That is the reason why if the steering wheel would have damaged the boat if it was not replaced then the cost that Joel's brother would have paid in order to repair all the damaged done by the wheel would have been much greater than just the cost of the steering wheel itself. Moreover, it is quite understood that they both had a tacit agreement that has been there for many years so therefore that Joel's brother must pay him otherwise, plus if the new wheel improves the value of the boat as well.
Answer:
The outcome of this game is that both countries will cheat
Explanation:
Solution
Recall that
For Russia:
If Qatar cheats or found cheating is = zero cheat
If Qatar co-operates = 140 million (co-operates or comply)
For Qatar:
If Russia cheats or found cheating is = it is considered as a zero cheat
If Russia cooperates = 140 million (co-operates or comply)
So,
The outcome of equilibrium = (0,0)
Therefore the outcome of this game is that both countries will cheat
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of part of the solution to the question given.
Answer:
$42.604
Explanation:
Using dividend growth model we have D1 = $1.25, dividend at end of year 1
P1 = $45 price at the end of year 1
Ke = 10% Cost of capital or expected return
g = ? the growth rate expected
Thus
D2 = D1 + g
$45 = 
$4.5 - 45g = 1.25 + g
$3.25 = 46g
7.06% = g
Now, using value of g we have
P0 = 
Current price P0 = $42.604
