Answer:
The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) should look for the contract terms that specify which party bears the costs associated with contract delivery delays.
In order to protect the government's best interest concerning the cost for the housing of the 200 soldiers for three weeks, the question to ask is if the contract provides that the contractor will bear the costs for housing the soldiers. Who occasioned the delay?
Explanation:
There are usually some costs with construction contracts not meeting deadlines. Some of them are that the asset may not be available at the required time for use, occasioning the need to incur some costs for alternatives. How would the gap be filled? Which party bears the costs of the delays? Are there provisions in the contract specifying the party that assumes liability for some unforeseen delays?
Answer: The answer is C. Inspection requires both product tear down and product reassembly.
Explanation: The aim of quality-control inspections is to ascertain whether a product has been made according to specifications, and whether there are any defects in the products.
Therefore quality-control inspections will involve product tear down, in order to check the component parts of a product for quality assurance, and product reassembly is carried out after the product tear down to reassemble the products if it is discovered that it meets quality standard.
Answer:
$232,500
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of expected cash outflows for selling and admin expenses is shown below:
Utilities expense $2,500
Administrative salaries $100,000
Sales commission ($800,000 × 5%) $40,000
Advertising $20,000
Rent on administrative building $60,000
Miscellaneous administrative expenses $10,000
Total budgeted cash sales and administrative expenses $232,500
We added those expenses which affect the cash balance i.e decrease in cash balance so that the correct amount could arrive
All other items are not relevant. hence,ignored it
Answer:
Dep expense for the second year 7,600
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}Year&Beginning&Dep-Expense&Acc. \: Dep&Ending\\0&-&-&-&47500\\1&47,500&9,500&9,500&38,000\\2&38,000&7,600&17,100&30,400\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7DYear%26Beginning%26Dep-Expense%26Acc.%20%5C%3A%20Dep%26Ending%5C%5C0%26-%26-%26-%2647500%5C%5C1%2647%2C500%269%2C500%269%2C500%2638%2C000%5C%5C2%2638%2C000%267%2C600%2617%2C100%2630%2C400%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
1/10 = straight-line method
straight-line x 2 = DD rate
47,500 x 2/10 = 9500
then we calculate the DD rate again with the book value
47,500-9,500 = 38,000
38,000 x 2/10 = 7,600
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Consumers will be unable to buy all the gas they want at the temporary price ceiling price.
Explanation:
At the time that the offer is recent for price control, demand can be stimulated by the existence of a more reasonable and affordable price for the consumer, so that there is an excess of demand against supply, which is It would imply that it should result in an increase in prices that should lead to an optimum level or breakeven point being reached at any given time, a situation that will not occur precisely because of price control.
By resenting the offer while increasing demand, despite the possible shortage, this shortage does not result in a price increase that would be normal, precisely due to the hand of the state that prevents free market development , since it restricts one of the factors that energizes it, which is the price.
The price of goods and services, as well as can increase or decrease the supply, can also increase or decrease demand, a game that alone should maintain a price that satisfies both consumers and producers, but when price control is introduced , only consumers will be satisfied, a situation that causes bidders to stop producing.
