Setting the pay according to the goals achieved
by a group may not be considered beneficial to everyone, thus decreasing motivation.
Pay-for-performance or according to individual performance may help motivate
the employee but increasing individuality in terms of performance may also decrease
group cohesiveness or group-related values. The speaker here shows depreciation by undervaluing another's work to overvalue or protect one's own.
Answer:
It is more profitable to continue processing.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A company has inventory that cost $50,000. Its scrap value is $65,000. The inventory could be sold for $150,000 if manufactured further at an additional cost of $80,000.
Sell for scrap= 65,000 - 50,000= 15,000
Continue processing= 150,000 - 80,000 - 50,000= 20,000
Answer:
$282,000
Explanation:
The computation of the capitalized amount of the land is shown below:
= Number of shares exchanged × fair value of per share - scrap selling value
= 6,000 shares × $50 per share - $18,000
= $300,000 - $18,000
= $282,000
Simply we multiplied the exchanged shares with its fair value and then deduct the scrap selling value so that the correct value can come.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:Only statements 1 and 2 are correct
Explanation: An effective team involves people who interact with each other to accomplish certain goals or meet certain needs. Team members work intensely with each other to achieve a specific, common goal or objective. This therefore attracts other people to them, that is magnetism. In as much as they look out to achieve their goals, they are also interested in others' success.
