Answer:
In the ideal sense, if Morgandi can transfer the knowledge she acquired from using the measuring tools while cooking to her math class, she will be able to learn the math quicker.
She will find it much easier than Eric to understand the math lessons about fractions
Morgandi was actively learning about fractions so she was practicing fractions. For Eric, he is probably learning about fractions for the first time so it will take time and practice for him to grasp the concept. If he is learning cognitively, he will need to actively practice fractions, for example, helping their mother cook and using measuring tools.
It will be easier for her as the math class will be like her cookng experience.Her mind may process the information in a way that it relates to her cooking experience.Morgandi is said to bring more interest to the learning situation than Eric.
She already has experience with the subject so it should be easier for her to learn. However, she may have to build her procedural knowledge, such as how to divide and multiply the fractions. Eric, however, who has never used fractions will have to obtain both declarative and procedural knowledge. He will have to learn general knowledge about fractions as well as how to divide and multiply them. Because of this, Eric will most likely take longer to learn the material.
Explanation:
in the learning process, an important factor to look to is what the individual brings to new learning situations. Having a foundational knowledge on which to construct additional knowledge will give one an edge over another as in the case of Morgandi who has a back up experience of cooking than Eric
Answer:
The hypothetical-deductive method has several essential steps: observation of the phenomenon to be studied, creation of a hypothesis to explain said phenomenon, deduction of consequences or propositions more elementary than the hypothesis itself, and verification or verification of the truth of the deduced statements. .
Explanation:
<u>We could say that this method was very aptly applied in the case of children of children of the peace movement in Colombia, because first The situation or problem was observed and recognized ;</u>more than 140 student leaders formed a special council. They divided into various "commissions" to discuss different aspects of the conflict. There was a commission for the construction of peace, a commission for human rights, another for displaced persons, etc. They met in a large room, with each commission supported by one of the adults. For many of the students, the idea of being asked what they thought about war and how they could help peace was a revelation. An example of this was that of Farlis Calle, who was then fifteen years old and who later became a prominent leader in the National Movement for Children for Peace, asked why they did not teach peace education in Colombian schools. "How can we learn to be peaceful if our teachers don't help us understand what it means? No one here has lived in peace. We have been fighting from the moment we were born. "At the end of the two-day session, the various commissions had come up with many suggestions: for peace education, recreation projects, cultural events, and" a youth movement working for peace.
<u>After taking advantage of Machel's visit, Farlis Calle had been chosen by the students as the first child mayor of Apartad & oacute; and they believed that this gave them the constitutional right to form a local government of children. So here come the proposals and verification of results</u> by means of which notices were sent to the municipal schools, for others to know that they could and should participate in their government , and soon as many as 200 children attended peace meetings three times a week, gathering on soccer fields and parks.
First couple are
3
used mass production tech to build inexpensive homes
4
suburbs
5
New York
6
impact-influenced the way people thought about social issues n Americans materialism n spread American culture through the world
.. can't find the second part to it
Answer: The Yerkes-Dodson law
Explanation:
Have you noticed that we sometimes perform better when we're nervous? For example, one might perform better at an event when one is excited. This relationship between an individual's arousal levels and his or her performance is called the Yerkes-Dodson Law.
The Yerkes-Dodson Law posits that a relationship exist between arousal and performance and an increase in arousal can boost performance, but the performance boost is only up to a certain point. In case of an excessive arousal, the performance reduces.