The number in isotope platinum-194 stands for the <em>total </em>amount of protons and neutrons. In other words, this is the mass. =)
<span>Melting is an endothermic process (i.e. it absorbs heat), whereas freezing is an exothermic process (i.e. it releases heat, or can be thought of, albeit incorrectly from a thermodynamics standpoint, as "absorbing cold"). The standard enthalpy of fusion of water can be used for both scenarios, but standard enthalpy is in units of energy/mass, so 10 times as much energy will be absorbed in the former scenario (melting 10 kg of ice) than what will be absorbed in the latter scenario (freezing 1 kg of water). For both processes, assuming the water is pure and at standard atmospheric pressure, and the entire mass remains at thermal equilibrium, the temperature of both the solid and the liquid will remain at precisely 0 degrees Celsius (273 K) for the duration of the phase change.</span>
First, we assume that helium behaves as an ideal gas such that the ideal gas law is applicable.
PV = nRT
where P is pressure, V is volume, n is number of moles, R is universal gas constant, and T is temperature. From the equation, if n, R, and T are constant, there is an inverse relationship between P and V. From the given choices, the container with the greatest pressure would be the 50 mL.
There can be three possible answers to this question: the amount of moles of SO₂ gas needed to react with 6.41 mol H₂S, and the amount of S and H₂O gas produced.
Amount of SO₂:
6.41 mol H₂S (1 mol SO₂/2 mol 2 mol H₂S) = <em>3.205 moles SO₂ gas</em>
Amount of S:
6.41 mol H₂S (3 mol S/2 mol 2 mol H₂S) =<em> 9.615 moles S solid</em>
Amount of H₂O:
6.41 mol H₂S (2 mol H₂O/2 mol 2 mol H₂S) = <em>6.41 moles H₂O gas</em>
Answer:
The adjustable legs and the table of sand.
<em>Note:The question is incomplete. The complete question is given below.</em>
Using Models to Answer Questions About Systems
Armando’s class was looking at images of rivers formed by flowing water. Most of the rivers were wide and shallow, but one river was narrow and deep. Armando’s class thinks that this river is narrow and deep because:
- the hill that the water flowed down was very steep, or
- the sand grains that the water flowed through were very small.
Armando designed the model below to try to answer the question: Why is this river so narrow and deep?
Explanation:
The model designed by Armando will be helpful to answer the question because of the following features it possesses:
1. An adjustable leg- since one of the hypotheses put forward by the class to explain why the river was narrow and deep was that the hill that the water flowed down was very steep, the adjustable legs can be lowered or raised in order to make the slope shallower or steeper so that their hypothesis can be tested.
2. A table of sand- the table of sand serves as the streambed. By adjusting the size of the sand grains to be larger or smaller, the students will be able to to test their second hypothesis that the small size sand grains that the water flowed through was the reason for the river to be narrow and deep.
The results of their experiments will enable them to come to a conclusion.