answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
2 years ago
7

A customer visiting the suit department of a certain store will purchase a suit with probability .22, a shirt with probability .

30, and a tie with probability .28. The customer will purchase both a suit and a shirt with probability .11, both a suit and a tie with probability .14, and both a shirt and a tie with probability .10. A customer will purchase all 3 items with probability .06. What is the probability that a customer purchases
(a) none of these items?

(b) exactly 1 of these items?
Mathematics
2 answers:
Flura [38]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

P (suit) P(A) =0.22

P (shirt) P(B) =0.30

P (tie) P(C) = 0.28

P(AB) =0.11

P(AC) =0.14

P(BC) = 0.10

P(ABC) = 0.06

(i)

Probability that none of the items are bought = 1 - probability that all the items are bought

P(none) = 1 - P(A u B u C)

= P( A u B u C) =

P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AB) - P(AB) - P(BC) + P(ABC)

= 0.22 + 0.30 + 0.28 - 0.11 - 0.14 - 0.10 + 0.06 = 0.51

P(A u B u C) = 0.51

Probability that he would buy none of the items = 1 - P( A u B u C)

1 - 0.51 = 0.49

(ii)

Probability of purchasing exactly one

= {(probability of buying a shirt) + (probability of purchasing a suit) + (probability of purchasing a tie)} - [(probability of purchasing a suit and a shirt) +(probability of purchasing a suit and a tie) + (probability of purchasing a shirt and a tie)]

= {(P(A) + P(B) + P(C)} - [P(AB) + P (AC) + P (BC)]

= {(0.22 + 0.30 + 0.28)} - [(0.11 + 14 + 0.10)]

= { 0.80 - 0.35}

= 0.45

Another way to calculate it would be:

1 - {(probability of purchasing none of the items ) + (probability of purchasing all the items)}

= 1 - {P (none) + P (all)}

= 1 - (0.49 + 0.06)

= 1- (0.55)

= 0.45

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability of purchasing a suit = 0.22, probability of purchasing a shirt =0.30 and probability of purchasing a tie = 0.28

both a suit and a shirt with probability .11: P(AB) =0.11

both a suit and a tie with probability .14, : P(AC) =0.14

and both a shirt and a tie with probability .10. : P(BC) = 0.10

all 3 items with probability .06. : P(ABC) = 0.06

So:

P (suit): P(A) =0.22

P (shirt): P(B) =0.30

P (tie): P(C) = 0.28

P (suit n shirt): P(AB) =0.11

P (suit and tie): P(AC) =0.14

P (shirt and tie): P(BC) = 0.10

Probability of purchasing all the items: P(ABC) = 0.06

Probability that none of the items are bought: P(none) = 1 - P(A u B u C)

P( A u B u C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AB) - P(AB) - P(BC) + P(ABC)

=0.22 + 0.30 + 0.28 - 0.11 - 0.14 - 0.10 + 0.06 = 0.51

P(A u B u C) = 0.51

Probability that he would buy all of the items = 1 - P( A u B u C)

1 - 0.51 = 0.49

(ii)

Probability of purchasing exactly one

={(probability of buying a shirt) + (probability of purchasing a suit) + ( probability of purchasing a tie)} {(probability of purchasing a suit and a shirt) +(probability of purchasing a suit and a tie) + (probability of purchasing a shirt and a tie)}

= {(P(A) + P(B) + P(C)) - ( P(AB) + P (AC) + P (BC)}

= {(0.22 + 0.30 + 0.28) - (0.11 + 14 + 0.10)

= { 0.80 - 0.35}

= 0.45

Another way to calculate it would be

1 {(probability of purchasing none of the items ) + (probability of purchasing all the items)}

= 1 - (0.49 + 0.06)

= 1- (0.55)

= 0.45

BigorU [14]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a) The probability that he doesnt but any items is 0.49

b) He buys exactly 1 of those items with probability 0.28

Step-by-step explanation:

lets call su the event that the customer purchases a suit, sh the event that teh customer purchases a shirt and t the event that the customer purchases a tie.

Remembe that for events A, B and C we have that

P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B)

P(A U B U C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A ∩ B) - P(A ∩ C) - P(B ∩ C) + P(A ∩ B ∩ C)

Also, we are given that

P(su) = 0.22

P(sh) = 0.3

p(t) = 0.28

p(su ∩ sh) =  0.11

P(su ∩ t) = 0.14

P(sh ∩ t) = 0.1

P(sh ∩ t ∩ su) = 0.06

The event that he doesnt buy any item has as complementary event su ∪ sh ∪ t, therefore

P( he doesnt but any items) = 1-P(su U sh U t) =

1-( P(su) + p(sh) + p(t) - P(su ∩ sh) - p(su∩t) - p(sh∩t) + p(su∩sh∩t) ) =

1-(0.22+0.30+0.28-0.11-0.14-0.1+0.06) = 1-0.51 = 0.49

b) The probability that he buys at least 2 items is equal to

p(su ∩ t) + p(su ∩ sh) + p(sh ∩ t) -2 p(su ∩ t ∩ sh) (because we are counting the triple intersection 3 times, so we need to remove it twice)

This number is

0.14+0.11+0.1-2*0.06 = 0.23

Thus, the probability that he buys exactly one item can be computed by substracting from one the probability of the complementary event : she buys 2 or more or non items

P(he buys exactly one item) = 1- ( p(he buys none items) + p(he buys at least 2) ) = 1- 0.49-0.23 = 0.28

You might be interested in
Suppose a1=12−12,a2=23−13,a3=34−14,a4=45−15,a5=56−16. a) Find an explicit formula for an: . b) Determine whether the sequence is
lorasvet [3.4K]

I'm going to assume you meant to write fractions (because if a_n are all non-negative integers, the series would clearly diverge), so that

a_1=\dfrac12-\dfrac12

a_2=\dfrac23-\dfrac13

a_3=\dfrac34-\dfrac14

and so on.

a. If the pattern continues as above, we would have the general term

a_n=\dfrac n{n+1}-\dfrac1{n+1}=\dfrac{n-1}{n+1}

b. Note that we can write a_n as

a_n=\dfrac{n-1}{n+1}=\dfrac{n+1-2}{n+1}=1-\dfrac2{n+1}

The series diverges by comparison to the divergent series

\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n

4 0
1 year ago
Crop researchers plant 15 plots with a new variety of corn. The yields in bushels per acre are: 138.0 139.1 113.0 132.5 140.7 10
son4ous [18]
There is a relationship between confidence interval and standard deviation:
\theta=\overline{x} \pm \frac{z\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}
Where \overline{x} is the mean, \sigma is standard deviation, and n is number of data points.
Every confidence interval has associated z value. This can be found online.
We need to find the standard deviation first: 
\sigma=\sqrt{\frac{\sum(x-\overline{x})^2}{n}
When we do all the calculations we find that:
\overline{x}=123.8\\ \sigma=11.84
Now we can find confidence intervals:
($90\%,z=1.645): \theta=123.8 \pm \frac{1.645\cdot 11.84}{\sqrt{15}}=123.8 \pm5.0\\($95\%,z=1.960): \theta=123.8 \pm \frac{1.960\cdot 11.84}{\sqrt{15}}=123.8 \pm 5.99\\ ($99\%,z=2.576): \theta=123.8 \pm \frac{2.576\cdot 11.84}{\sqrt{15}}=123.8 \pm 7.87\\
We can see that as confidence interval increases so does the error margin. Z values accociated with each confidence intreval also get bigger as confidence interval increases.
Here is the link to the spreadsheet with standard deviation calculation:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pnsJIrM_lmQKAGRJvduiHzjg9mYvLgpsCqCoGYvR5Us/edit?usp=sharing
6 0
2 years ago
In 7 days, Mario cooked 98 pounds of spaghetti. Each day after the first, he cooked 2 more pounds than he cooked than the day be
yan [13]

so I need to do a list of numbers like this:

98, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110.

104 is the median number

add 98+100+102+104+106+108+110=728

divide by seven 728 / 7 = 104

so the difference between the median 104 and the avarage 104 is 0 they are

104=104


hope this helps

7 0
1 year ago
the daily profit in dollars of a specialty cake shop is described by the function P(x)=-3x^2+168x-1920. Where x is the number of
forsale [732]

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following function:

f(x)=-3x^{2} +168x-1920

where a=-3, b=168 and c=-1920

In order to calculate the maxium profit for the company, and how many cakes should be prepared in order to reach it, we have to calculate where the parabola's vertex is ubicated. To do so, we use the following formula:

Xv= \frac{-b}{2a}

Xv= \frac{-168}{2.(-3)}

Xv= \frac{-168}{2.(-3)}

Xv= 28

So 28 cakes should be prepared per day in order to maximize profit.

7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Say a certain service industry has 78.9 thousand jobs in 2003, but expects to increase at an average annual rate of 2.65 thousan
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

33%

Step-by-step explanation:

In 2003, there were 78.9 thousand jobs in the industry and it increases annually by 2.65 thousand jobs from 2003 to 2013.

Hence, from 2003 to 2013, i.e. 10 years the jobs have increased by (2.65×10) = 26.5 thousand.

Therefore, the percent increase in jobs in the industry from 2003 to 2013 is given by \frac{26.5*100}{78.9} = 33.6 % ≈ 33%. (Answer)

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Round 645 to the nearest ten
    10·1 answer
  • Polygon ABCDE has the vertices A(2, 8), B(4, 12), C(10, 12), D(8, 8), and E(6, 6). Polygon MNOPQ has the vertices M(-2, 8), N(-4
    12·1 answer
  • Coffee with sugar and milk added to it can contain up to calories. To consume a maximum of 600 mg if caffeine per day, how many
    11·2 answers
  • Solve for m: <br> 2/5=m/70
    9·2 answers
  • The formula for percentage increase I (given as a decimal) of an investment is I=S−PP, where P is the purchase price and S is th
    14·2 answers
  • Joshua is doing a chemistry experiment that calls for a 30% solution of copper sulfate. He has 40ml of 25% solution. How many mi
    8·1 answer
  • On a coordinate plane, a piecewise function has 2 lines. The first line has a closed circle at (0, 3) and then goes down through
    6·2 answers
  • Rahmi bought 1 pair of jean and 2 t-shirts. How much did rahmi spend? Write equations to solve. Use a letter to represent the un
    13·1 answer
  • Determine which of (a)-(d) form a solution to the given system for any choice of the free parameter. (HINT: All parameters of a
    9·2 answers
  • Sarah invested $800 in an account paying an interest rate of 3.5% compounded quarterly. Assuming no deposits or withdrawals are
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!