Answer:
$532,000
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is the cost of the best option rejected.
In this case the option rejected was the investment project that would have returned a total fo 532,000
Therefore, the model 240 should produce a higher profit than 532,000 to reject his project.
The 310 model would have unused capacity as it has more capacity than model 240 but the company will not need to produce as much. So it is discarted from the calculation as it has inefficiency
Answer:
The correct statement is Option No. 4 which is "straight bonds are more costly to issue than convertible bonds".
Explanation:
Option 4 "straight bonds are more costly to issue than convertible bonds" is true because generally convertible bonds offer low yield , so it is the lowest cost for issuers.
Answer:
Product market expansion grid
Explanation:
Product market expansion grid -
It is used to plan for the company , when the company is indeed of expanding , is referred to as Product market expansion grid .
The strategy or information required for the company to increase sale of the goods and services or introducing a new product in the upcoming market , uses this plan.
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct term is Product market expansion grid .
Answer:
May's sales that are expected to be noncollectable are $7500.
Explanation:
The total collections from a months's credit sales is expected to be as follows,
35% in the month of sale
54% in the following month
6% in the second month after sale
The remaining is expected to be noncollectable.
The credit sales for a month are equal to 100%.
The percentage of noncollectable sales is = 100 - (35 + 54 + 6) = 5%
Thus, 5% of each month's sale is expected to be noncollectable.
May's sales that are expected to be noncollectable are,
Noncollectable Sales-May = 150000 * 0.05 = $7500
All that information gives you three points to make the graph.
Point 1:
At the price of $10, the offer is 2*1,000 shoes => (10, 2,000)
At the price of $25, the offer is 10*1,200 shoes => (25, 12,000)
At the price of $40, the offer is 10*1400 + 4*500 => (40, 16,000)
Then you have three points. You can check that their are not aligned because when you increase the price $15 from 10 to 25 the offer increases in 10,000 shoes; but when you increase the price $15 from 25 to 40, the offer increases 4,000.
To draw the grpah:
- use a perpendicular coordinate system with the price in the horizontal axis and the offer in the vertical axis,
- lable the horizontal axis with the prices from 10 to 50 and the vertical axis with the offers from 1,000 to 18,000.
- draw the three calculated points (10; 2,000) , (25; 12,000) and (40; 16,000)
- draw a curved line that passes through the three points.
Ther you have the graph.