answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
2 years ago
11

An decrease in the price of oranges would lead to a(n)a. a movement down and to the left along the supply curve for oranges. b.

a movement up and to the right along the supply curve for oranges. c. increased supply of oranges. d. increase in the prices of inputs used in orange production.
Business
2 answers:
Montano1993 [528]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) a movement down and to the left along the supply curve for oranges

Explanation:

Supply curve shows a relationship between the price of goods and the quantity supplied. It tells the amount that producers are willing to supply at each price. The curve shows a plot of price against quantity supplied by the suppliers.

When the price of the orange decreases, producers would not be willing to supply more oranges, therefore the quantity of orange supplied would decrease. Thereby causing a movement down and to the left of the supply curve as a result of decrease in quantity supplied.

vagabundo [1.1K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A movement up and to the right along the supply curves for oranges.

Explanation:

Supply curve can be defined as the graphical representation of the relationship that exists between the product price and quantity of product that a seller is ready and able to supply. The product price is measured on the vertical axis of the graph while the quantity of product supplied is measured on the horizontal axis.

A decrease in the price of oranges would lead to a decrease in the quantity of oranges supplied thereby leading to a movement up and to the right along the supply curve for oranges.

You might be interested in
The Sports Club plans to pay an annual dividend of $1.20 per share next year, $1.12 per share a year for the following two years
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

$9.63

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Year              Annual dividend paid

   1                                      $1.20

   2                                      $1.12

   3                                      $1.12

   4                                      $14.20

Now,

Year       Annual dividend paid        Present value factor     Present value

   1                              $1.20                          0.84246               1.011

   2                             $1.12                          0.84246               0.7949

   3                             $1.12                          0.59793             0.6696

   4                             $14.20                       0.50373             7.1529

===============================================================

Worth of stock = 1.011 + 0.7949 + 0.6696 + 7.1529

= $9.6284 ≈ $9.63

Note:

Present value factor = [ 1 ÷ (1 + 0.187)ⁿ]

here,

n is the year

7 0
2 years ago
Mark has $100,000 to invest. His financial consultant advises him to diversify his investment in three types of bonds: short-ter
Airida [17]

Answer:

Mark should invest:

  • $30,000 in short term bonds
  • $30,000 in intermediate term bonds
  • $40,000 in long term bonds

Explanation:

S = short term bonds

I = intermediate term bonds

L = long term bonds

S + I + L = 100,000

0.04S + 0.06I + 0.07L = 0.058 x 100,000 = 5,800

S = I

2S + L = 100,000

L = 100,000 - 2S (now we replace both I and L)

0.04S + 0.06s + 0.07(100,000 - 2S) = 5,800

0.1S + 7,000 - 0.14S = 5,800

7,000 - 5,800 = 0.14S - 0.1S

1,200 = 0.04S

S = 1,200 / 0.04 = 30,000

I = 30,000

L = 100,000 - 60,000 = 40,000

5 0
2 years ago
A chemical manufacturer is setting up capacity in Europe and North America for the next three years. Annual demand in each marke
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

The two choices under consideration are building 4 million units of capacity in North America

YEAR                         1                    2                           3  

Production and Sales 4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00  

Variable cost @ 10  40,000,000.00   40,000,000.00   40,000,000.00  

Divide by:

Conversion Factor  1.33                         1.33                     1.33  

Multiply by:

Growth(.1*.5)+(-.05*.5) 1.025                        1.025^2                  1.025^3  

NET CASHFLOWS  30,827,068.00   31,597,744.00   32,387,688.00  

DCF @ 10%     0.909090909           0.83                  0.75  

Present Values  28,024,607.27   26,113,838.02   24,333,349.36  

NET TOTAL COST 78,471,794.65  

or building 2 million units of capacity in each of the two loca-tions. Building two plants will incur an additional one-time cost of $2 million.

YEAR                  0            1                      2                              3  

Production and Sales       4,000,000.00      4,000,000.00   4,000,000.00  

Variable cost @ [(10+9)/2] 38,000,000.00  38,000,000.00   38,000,000.00  

Additional cost  2,000,000.00      

Conversion Factor     1.33     1.33                   1.33                       1.33  

Growth(.1*.5)+(-.05*.5)    1.025               1.025^2              1.025^3  

CASHFLOWS  1,503,759.40  29,285,714.29  30,017,857.00  30,768,304.00  

DCF @ 10%       1           0.909090909    0.826446281 0.751314801  

Present Value 1,503,759.40  26,623,376.62   24,808,146.28   23,116,682.19  

NET TOTAL COST = 76,051,964.50  

DECISION: The manufacturer should build 2 plants in 2 different locations because it gives a lower net present cost

<u>At what initial cost differential from building the two plants will the chemical manufacturer be indifferent between the two options?</u>

The difference in both options came from the fact that variable cost is lower in Europe and building the plant is more expensive. If there is no increase in cost and variable cost is same everywhere, then both options will be same.

5 0
2 years ago
A company currently makes a component used in production. The per unit costs incurred to make the component include: Direct mate
elixir [45]

Answer:

The company should make the components because incremental costs are $2 less than the purchase price

Explanation:

The cost of making each unit of component = Direct Labour + Direct Material + Variable Overhead*

*The overhead cost of $4 contains both a fixed and variable element. It has been mentioned that 25% of overhead cost is incremental i.e. it increases with each additional unit produced (marginal cost). The incremental cost is the variable element.

Variable element = $4 x 25% = $1

Fixed element = $4 x 75% = $3

Thus, the cost of making each unit of component = $5 + $2 + $1 = $8,

whereas the cost of purchasing each unit of complement is $10. Hence, the company should produce the component as it is less by $2 ($10 - $8) to produce than it is to purchase.

5 0
2 years ago
You are an industry analyst for the telecom sector. You are analyzing financial reports from two companies: tt &amp; t Inc. and
Novay_Z [31]
B is carret because I try and solve this
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Janice is going to give her patient a bath. she has the option of using prepackaged bathing wipes or a bath basin and washcloths
    10·1 answer
  • Skill, road surfacing, lubricants, tires, brakes, and the weight of the car are all examples that can create what type of drivin
    11·2 answers
  • At the end of the year, Swain Company had the following information: Credit sales for the year $1,000,000 Accounts receivable, b
    15·1 answer
  • A sale transaction on rental property closes on December 10th. The landlord received the December rent of $4,400 on December 1.
    12·1 answer
  • The earnings and dividends of Nsuala Computer Co. are expected to grow at an annual rate of 15 percent over the next 4 years and
    13·1 answer
  • Jaybird Company operates in a highly competitive market where the market price for its product is $62 per unit. Jaybird desires
    15·1 answer
  • Darren has the option of investing in either Stock A or Stock B. There is a 45 percent chance that the return on Stock A will be
    8·1 answer
  • Hi Jennie, As you may know, Macy’s is in a battle with Abercrombie &amp; Fitch for sales among 15- to 20-year-old female custome
    11·1 answer
  • Buggy Wars Two friends and neighbours arrange to go into business together and then become bitter rivals: This is the story of B
    7·1 answer
  • MSK Construction Company contracted to construct a factory building for $525,000. Construction started during 20X1 and was compl
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!