Answer:
Higher literacy rates do not necessarily result in higher income levels
Explanation:
Higher literacy rates do not necessarily result in higher income levels
Literacy Rate was 91% in Zimbabwe yet the percentage of people living on less than $1 per day was 56%.Thus, literacy rates do not necessarily result in higher income levels.
If I had to promote settlement to Florida, I would target the Agricultural benefit that people would obtain in Florida.
Here is the ad sample:
__________________________________________________________
BRING YOUR FAMILY HERE!
New opportunities had arise! Obtain an acre of land for $1.25 ! The price would rise ten fold within the next five years!
You can use the Land Various things! The weather is so perfect, everything could grow here! Tomatoes, peppers, peanuts, snap beans, cotton, watermelons, or even potatoes! You name It! Contact the local government for further details.
__________________________________________________________
Answer:
price
Explanation:
It will be easy to provide an example to better illustrate this. Lets suppose that a patient has been diagnosed with cancer and is trying to figure which between chemotherapy or taking drugs is the best treatment. The question this cancer patient is going to ask herself is which among the two will prolong her life. Thus, survival time is the response variable. In our case, the price is the response variable because it is the determining factor of where these college students will live. Amenities somehow affect the price and thus, it will act as the response variable. Price is what we are able to measure and the location which is the students' primary interest lies in our response variable
He strengthened royal courts by having the jury formally accuse a person of having committed a serious crime. He introduced the courts that were governed by the King and that would put subjects on trial, which weakened the feudal lords who had that power earlier.
Answer:
New York Times V. United States 1971
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times.
The government used the reasoning of national security by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was that the government couldn't say that there was a danger to the United States if they couldn't prove it.
Explanation:
