Answer:
d.There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the quality and price of a car are associated. There were ten cars used in the sample.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have two variables X₁: quality score of a car and X₂: the price of a car.
It was analyzed id there is an association between the quality and the price.
The null hypothesis of a Spearman's rank correlation test is:
H₀: There is no association between the quality and the price of cars.
The researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis which means that there is no association between the variables of interest.
The sample size is listed in the output n= 10 consumer reports.
I hope you have a SUPER day!
Before we could add these numbers, 3/8 and 7/10 need a common denominator. Both 8 and 10 go into 40.
8 goes into 40 five times
3/8= (3*5)/40 = 15/40
10 goes into 40 four times
7/10= (7*4)/40= 28/40
ANSWER: A) 15/40 and 28/40
Hope this helps! :)
The four options are attached below
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>Second attachment is the correct choice
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>ASA (angle-side-angle) means that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle
<u>Now, let's check the choices:</u><u>First attachment:</u>
It shows that two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second one. This is congruency by SAS. Therefore, this option is
incorrect<u>Second attachment:</u>
It shows that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle. This is congruency by ASA. Therefore, this option is
correct<u>Third attachment:</u>
It shows that the three angles in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three angles in the second one. This is not enough to prove congruency. Therefore, this option is
incorrect<u>Fourth attachment:</u>
It shows that the three sides in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second one. This is congruency by SSS. Therefore, this option is
incorrect.
Based on the above, the second attachment is the only correct one
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
d. can be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
True on the special case when r =1 we have that 
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to remember that the correlation coefficient is a measure to analyze the goodness of fit for a model and is given by:
![r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn%28%5Csum%20xy%29-%28%5Csum%20x%29%28%5Csum%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Bn%5Csum%20x%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20x%29%5E2%5D%5Bn%5Csum%20y%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20y%29%5E2%5D%7D%7D)
The determination coefficient is given by 
Let's analyze one by one the possible options:
a. can never be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False if r = 1 then
b. is always larger than the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False not always if r= 1 we have that 
and we don't satisfy the condition
c. is always smaller than the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
False again if r =1 then we have and we don't satisfy the condition
d. can be equal to the value of the coefficient of determination (r2).
True on the special case when r =1 we have that
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a group of students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below.
Data set is as ollows:
70 79 38 63 44 23 62 61 67 50 61 70 94 87 65
H0: mu = 60 sec
Ha: mu not equals 60 sec
Mean diff = 2.27
Test statistic = 2.27/SE =0.4815
p value =0.6376
Since p>0.05, we accept null hypothesis
i.e. there is statistical evidence to say that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute
