Please help

Sue Jones is insured for bodily injury in the amount of 10/20. She is at fault in an accident in which Albert Smith is injured.

lianna [129]

For this case, what you should know is that Sue Jones insurance covers half of the expenses. Equivalently, her insurance covers:
10/20 = 1/2 = 0.5
Therefore, we have then that
a. for Albert
0.5 * (12000) = $ 6000
b. for Sam
0.5 * (8000) = $ 4000
c. total
The sum of the results of parts a and b
$ 6000 + $ 4000 = $ 10,000
answer
$ 6000
$ 4000
$ 10,000

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The image of trapezoid PQRS after a reflection across Line W Y is trapezoid P'Q'R'S'. 2 trapezoids are shown. Line W Y is the li

RoseWind [281]

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the Hinge Theorem used to show? A. that two triangles are similar B. the relative lengths of the corresponding sides in

Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

B. The relative lengths of the corresponding sides in two triangles.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that, Hinge theorem states that if two sides of one triangle is congruent to two sides of another triangle and the included angle of the first is larger than the included angle of the second, then the third side of the first triangle is longer than the third side of the second triangle.

Or we can also say it as, if two triangles have two congruent sides (sides of equal length), then the triangle with the larger angle between those sides will have a longer third side.

So basically,Hinge theorem compares the relative lengths of the corresponding sides in two triangles.

8 0

2 years ago

What is the expression in radical form? (7x^3y^2) 2/7

Gelneren [198K]

$\sqrt[7]{(7x^3y^2)^{2} } = \sqrt[7]{(49x^6y^4)}$
In a fractional exponent the denominator tells what root it is (7th root in this case) and the numerator tells what the value in the parenthesis is raised to (2nd power in this case)

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which logic statement represents this argument? If it’s a weekend, I exercise. It’s not a weekend. So, I won’t exercise. Assume

geniusboy [140]

P = It is a weekend
Q = I will exercise

If "It is a weekend", then "I will exercise"
But "It is NOT a weekend"
Therefore, "I will NOT exercise"

Using P and Q our statement would look like this,
If P, then Q
But not P
Therefore not Q

Or symbolically like this:
P -> Q
~P
$\therefore$ ~Q

I'm sorry that this doesn't match up with the options you posted.
Maybe they didn't paste correctly.

8 0

2 years ago