answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVEN [57.7K]
2 years ago
7

The price tag on a tennis ball in 1975 read $0.10, and the price tag on a tennis ball in 2005 read $1.00. The CPI in 1975 was 52

.3, and the CPI in 2005 was 191.3. Refer to Scenario 24-1. In 1975 dollars, a 1975 tennis ball cost $0.10 and a 2005 tennis ball cost: a) $0.27, so tennis balls were cheaper in 1975.b) $3.66, so tennis balls were cheaper in 1975.c) $3.66, so tennis balls were cheaper in 2005.d) $0.27, so tennis balls were cheaper in 2005.
Business
2 answers:
nika2105 [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a) $0.27, so tennis balls were cheaper in 1975.

Explanation:

formula for real price is

Real Price in year t = Nominal Price in year t × Adjustment factor

Adjustment factor is measured using the CPI values.

Real Price in year t = Nominal Price in year t × <u>CPI in base year</u>

                                                                             CPI in year t

 Real Price in year 2005 = Nominal Price in year 2005 × <u>CPI in 1975</u>

                                                                                              CPI in 2005

                     = 1 × <u>52.3</u>

                             191.3

                  = 0.27 = $0.27

The real price of tennis balls in 1975 was $0.10

Therefore, tennis balls were cheaper in 1975.

option a is correct

erma4kov [3.2K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a) $0.27, so tennis balls were cheaper in 1975.

Explanation:

This is a question that has to do with the time value of money & includes accounting for inflation.

Let's list out the given parameters us:

Nominal price (1975) = $0.10, CPI (1975) = 52.3, Nominal price (2005) = $1.00, CPI (2005) = 191.3

We want to know how much the tennis ball cost in 1975 dollars, hence, we make 1975 our base year. The calculation follows below:

Real price (2005) = Nominal price (2005) * CPI (1975) ÷ CPI (2005)

Real price (2005) = 1.00 * 52.3 ÷ 191.3

Real price (2005) = $0.2734

Real price (2005) = $0.27

The calculation reveals to us that a 2005 tennis ball cost $0.27 (in 1975 dollars). Which means that a tennis ball in 2005 is more costly than it did in 1975.

Hence, option A is the correct answer

You might be interested in
If someone were unable to pay cash right now, which financing option would be best for the laptop and for the refrigerator?
cricket20 [7]

i believe the answer is c

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pepper Company reports a $120,000 increase in inventory and a $40,000 increase in accounts payable during the year. Cost of Good
True [87]

Answer:

The cash payments made to suppliers were $1,280,000

Explanation:

Cash Payment made to the supplier can be calculated using the following formula

Cash Payment made to suppliers = Cost of Goods Sold + Increase in Inventory - Increase in account payable

By Placing values in the formula

Cash Payment made to suppliers = $1,200,000 + $120,000 - $40,000

ash Payment made to suppliers = $1,280,000

4 0
2 years ago
Cool Beans is a locally owned coffeeshop that competes with two large coffee chains, PlanetEuro and Frothies. Alicia, the owner,
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

0.9717 per unit sold (approx)

Explanation:

Here, we are assuming 52 weeks in a year.

Contribution margin:

= (Sales revenue - variable cost) ÷ sales revenue

= [(3.52 × 10 + 3.52 × 0.18 × 540 × 52) - (3.52 × 0.26 × 551)] ÷ (3.52 × 10 + 3.52 × 0.18 × 540 × 52)

=  [(35.2 + 17,791) - (504)] ÷ (35.2 + 17,791)

= [17,826.2 - 504] ÷ 17,826.2

= 17,322.2 ÷ 17,826.2

= $0.9717 per unit sold (approx)

5 0
2 years ago
Carpet Woes. Beau went shopping at ABC Carpet. He saw some carpet he liked but could not make up his mind. The manager at ABC Ca
ella [17]

Answer: The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.

Explanation:

Based on the information given in the question, we should note that the court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.

We should note that under a predominant purpose test, it will apply when the transaction involved is Mena for goods sales and not for the service sales.

4 0
1 year ago
A corporation issues for cash $9,000,000 of 8%, 30-year bonds, interest payable semiannually. The amount received for the bonds
Sloan [31]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

- The Semiannually total interest  Payable will be calculate as

30*2 = 60 Semiannual Times Payments

- Interest Payments

$9,000,000*8%/2=$360,000

- So the Total payments will be paid semiannually 60 times $360,000 with the principle amount $9,000,000

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes direct materials in a manufacturing setting?A) Direct materials are used to determine total manufactur
    7·1 answer
  • Nero signs a check "pay to the order of Olive" drawn on Nero's account in Plum Bank- Olive signs the back of the check. Secondar
    6·1 answer
  • Sunlight Design Corporation sells glass vases at a wholesale price of $4.50 per unit. The variable cost to manufacture is $1.75
    9·1 answer
  • Company XYY has recently won several bids and is now discussing how to structure the staff so that every contract can be success
    12·2 answers
  • Taggart Transcontinental pays no dividends, but spent $4 billion on share repurchases last year. Taggart's equity cost of capita
    5·1 answer
  • TPW, a calendar year taxpayer, sold land with a $535,000 tax basis for $750,000 in February. The purchaser paid $75,000 cash at
    5·1 answer
  • module 3 BlockWood Inc. has been providing raw materials to Couches Corp., a furniture company. The management at Couches recent
    5·1 answer
  • Least-Squares Regression [LO5-11] [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Bargain Rental Car offer
    10·1 answer
  • Stew Beauf is a self-employed surfboard-maker in 2019. His Schedule C net income is $152,800 for the year. He also has a part-ti
    5·1 answer
  • Dove and Eagle formed a business entity in which they are equal owners. Dove contributed cash of $100,000, and Eagle contributed
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!