Answer:
Type 1 incident
Explanation:
An incident usually considered as a 'type 1' if it possess huge threats for the lives of many people and could create a huge cost for the government in terms of property damage (Example of this would be huge wild fire, hurricane , massive flood, etc)
To handle type 1 incident, Government tend to utilize a groups of federally certified teams to handle the operation. (with much more training experience compared to local team). These federally certified teams will have access to large number of national resources with all Command and General Staff positions are activated,
Answer:
1. The ecosystem would eventually return to its original state
Explanation:
There is a whole part of ecology concerned about the effects fires have on the ecosystem and its processes.<u> It has been determined that most of the ecosystems are very renewable, managing to return to the previous state after the fires. </u>
For nature, fires are the normal process and the ecosystem is therefore adaptable to them. They manage to help the soil, clean out the litter, and shape the environment for regrowth. There are even species of animals and plants whose existence and reproduction is connected to the fires.
With human interventions in both starting and suppressing the fires, the ecosystem is disrupted and there is less chance of renewal.
Lena is demonstrating "generativity".
<span>According to Erik Erikson, generativity refers to a worry for individuals other than self and family that for the most part creates amid middle age; particularly : a need to sustain and manage more youthful individuals and to the next generation.</span>
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
She is participating in a position evaluation
