Hello.<span><span> </span><span>
<span><span>
-------
Let 2003 be the zero year; then 2005 is the three year, and 2008 the 5 year.
---------------
P = ab^x
---
P(3) = ab^3 = 800000
P(0) = ab^0 = 900000
---
a = 900000
Solve for "b"::
b^3 = 8/9
b = 2/cbrt(9)
----
Equation::
P(x) = 900000^x
----
Ans: P(5) = 900000
Have a nice day</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
The answer is the option A

Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The lateral area of a right rectangular prism is equal to

where
P is the perimeter of the base
h is the height of the prism
Find the perimeter


substitute in the formula

The rate of change is shown to the right of the second graph as being -2
At 5 to 6 the average rate of change is -11, so at 6 to 7 the rate of change would be -11-2 = -13, then from 7 to 8 it would be -13-2 = -15.
The answer is D. -15
Answer:
1 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
The first step is to figure out the lightest and the heaviest bad. The lightest bag is 4 1/4 and the heaviest is 5 3/4. Now to subtract, you can't subtract this as a mixed fraction so turn each fraction into an improper fraction by multiplying the whole number by the denominator then adding the numerator to the product of the whole number multiplied by the denominator (if you didn't know numerator is the top and the denominator is the bottom. To find out 4 1/4 as an improper fraction follow these steps (4*4+1=17) so 4 1/4=17/4. The process is the same for 5 3/4 (5*4+3=23) so 5 3/4= 23/4. Now to subtract, you subtract the numerator but not the denominator. You subtract because the question asks how many more and that means to subtract 23/4-17/4= 6/4. Last step is to turn this back into a mixed fraction do that by dividing the numerator by the denominator, 6 divided by 4 equals 1.5 and turn the decimal into a fraction 1 is a whole number so you don't change that but the 5 behind the decimal needs to be changed so now 1.5= 1 5/10 and last step is simplify 1 1/2. Hope this helped :).
Answer:
- Andre subtracted 3x from both sides
- Diego subtracted 2x from both sides
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Andre</u>
Comparing the result of Andre's work with the original, we see that the "3x" term on the right is missing, and the x-term on the left is 3x less than it was. It is clear that Andre subtracted 3x from both sides of the equation.
__
<u>Diego</u>
Comparing the result of Diego's work with the original, we see that the "2x" term on the left is missing, and the x-term on the right is 2x less than it was. It is clear that Diego subtracted 2x from both sides of the equation.
_____
<em>Comment on their work</em>
IMO, Diego has the right idea, as his result leaves the x-term with a positive coefficient. He can add 8 and he's finished, having found that x=14.
Andre can subtract 6 to isolate the variable term, and that will give him -x=-14. This requires another step to get to x=14. Sometimes minus signs get lost, so this would not be my preferred sequence of steps.
As a rule, I like to add the opposite of the variable term with the least (most negative) coefficient. This results in the variable having a positive coefficient, making errors easier to avoid.