All categories

1 year ago

Why would a party with numerous issues agree to focus on the single issue of inflation?

1 answer:

5 0

I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that by agreeing on single issue of inflation is due to the need to have one . For the sense of having singularity for the group.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.

You might be interested in

Littman LLC placed in service on July 29, 2019, machinery and equipment (seven-year property) with a basis of $600,000. Littman'

n200080 [17]

Answer:

Option C) Littman's $179 expense will be greater than $100,000

Explanation:

Data:

Littman LLC placed in service on July 29, 2019, machinery and equipment (seven-year property) with a basis of $600,000. Littman's income for the current year before any depreciation deduction was $100,000

From the options, In order to minimize depression, Littman's $179 expense will be greater than $100,000. This will come from the profit loss reconciliation. Hence option C will be the correct option in this case.

4 0

1 year ago

Carter Industries has two divisions: the West Division and the East Division. Information relating to the divisions for the year

Rashid [163]

Answer:

B. $132,000.

Solution : Segment margin is calculated by deducting all expenses that are directly traceable to the segment. it doesn't include corporate common expenses.

So, Contribution = 50000 x(10-6) = $ 200000

Less : Direct fixed cost ($ 68000)

Segment Margin $ 132000

5 0

1 year ago

Compensate for the risk. Delay an action. Reject the risk. Transfer the risk. A squad needs to cross a narrow footbridge across

finlep [7]

Answer:

Compensate for the risk

Explanation:

In the context of the scenario given , risk is defined as a form of exposure to a potential dangerous situation.

It is necessary for any person organization facing a risky situation to look for ways of minimizing or avoiding the risk in order to reduce related losses. Risks can be avoided through transfer , rejection , delayed action and compensating the risk,

The method of risk aversion described in the scenario is to compensate the risk.

Compensating the risk is a risk control method of using an alternative means to achieve a particular purpose in order to avoid the related risks to using the initial method.

7 0

1 year ago

How is a cost-leader protected from threats from powerful suppliers? It is able to create a significant difference between perce

puteri [66]

Answer:

Option B (By embracing lower operating costs it's much more likely to handle price rises) is the correct choice.

Explanation:

Cost management or leadership seems to be an organizational practice introduced by Michael Porter. This helps build organizational competitive benefits. Price leadership relates to supplying the market with the cheapest operating costs, which varies from the pricing strategy.
Sometimes it is driven by performance, size, complexity, reach, infrastructure as well as the perspective of the organization.

Some other options given should not be concerning the condition in question. And the correct response would be alternative B.

5 0

2 years ago

Superior Micro Products uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data for the Assembly Department for May

JulijaS [17]

Answer

(a) cost per equivalent unit

Item Material Labour Overheads

Cost per EU($) 84.15 34.25 172.25

b) Total cost per equivalent = $290.65

Explanation:

The weighted average method of valuation of work in progress does not separate opening work-in progress from the newly introduced.

The cost per equivalent units using this method is computed by dividing the total equivalent units by the cost element. This repeated for each of cost element categories.

Item Material Labour Overheads

Opening WIP 36,900 61,650 299,715

Cost added 223,965 41,100 199,810

Total cost($) a 260,865 102,750 499,525

Equivalent unit b 3,100 3,000 2,900

Cost per EU($) (a/b) 84.15 34.25 172.25

Total cost per equivalent unit = 84.15 + 34.25 + 172.25

Total cost per equivalent= $290.65

8 0

1 year ago