Answer:
the price of adult ticket and student ticket be $10.50 and $8.25 respectively
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us assume the price of adult ticket be x
And, the price of student ticket be y
Now according to the question
2x + 2y = $37.50
x + 3y = $35.25
x = $35.25 - 3y
Put the value of x in the first equation
2($35.25 - 3y) + 2y = $37.50
$70.50 - 6y + 2y = $37.50
-4y = $37.50 - $70.50
-4y = -$33
y = $8.25
Now x = $35.25 - 3($8.25)
= $10.5
Hence, the price of adult ticket and student ticket be $10.50 and $8.25 respectively
I would guess the answer to be Tension, if not for the extra 'X'....
or
Extension, if you add another 'E'...
Answer:
Option B. 1990 - 1992
Step-by-step explanation:
If we have to calculate inflation rate in year 2000 from 1990, we use the formula

which means if consumer price index is increasing year by year the inflation rate will increase.
Now we analyse our options given with the help of graph given.
A. from 1994 - 2000
Consumer price index increased from year 1994 to 1998 but decreased between 1998 to 2000.
So this option doesn't show the continuous inflation.
B. Year 1990 - 1992
We find a continuous increase in C.P.I. therefore there will be a continuous increase in inflation.
So this option is correct.
C. Year 1992 - 1996
In this gap we see deflation from year 1992 to 1994 then inflation between 1994 - 1996.
So there is ups and downs in this period showing discontinuity in inflation.
D. 1992 - 1994
There is continuous decrease in C.P.I. so continuous deflation is reported between this period.
It's not the correct option.
Answer is Option B.
The answer is 224.7 you got to turn 30% into decimal which is 0.30
then multiply 0.30 and 749 which equals 224.7
Answer:
A Type II error is when the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected even when the alternative hypothesis is true.
In this case, it would represent that the new program really increases the pass rate, but the sample taken is not enough statistical evidence to prove it. Then, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
The consequence is that the new method would be discarded (or changed) eventhough it is a real improvement.
Step-by-step explanation: