Answer:
- Difference in culture
- Difference in resources availability
- Difference in geographical location
- Difference in Relationship with other societies
Explanation:
Difference in culture create a different standard of what considered to be right and what considered to be wrong. Sometimes, tolerance for violence in a certain culture become so high to the point where it is very hard for peace to develop.
Resource availability and geographical location determine how much wealth the society can accumulate. Society that accumulate more wealth tend to be more peaceful compared to starving society.
Last but not least, relationship with other societies. When a society managed to build a mutually beneficial relationship with its neighboring societies, peace development would most likely be accelerated since they are in the mindset of helping/building each other up.
Neither of the two answers.
The real answer is Frederick W. Taylor.
Hugo Munsterberg pioneered the field of i/o psychology but was not an engineer that was credited with stimulating the beginning of the field.
Walter Dill Scott was not an engineer but only a true industrial psychologist who contributed to i/o psychology but not in developing it.
Hope this helps
Answer:
The best answer choice from the list given, for the question: When deciding on specific kinds of evidence to use in a persuasive argument, the following kinds of evidence should be considered: Select one... would be, C: Factual, sensible and useful.
Explanation:
Persuasive writing is another way of speaking about argumentative essay writing. The point of this type of writing is to persuade a reader to accept the specific viewpoint on a matter on the part of the writer, and convince him by providing evidence that shows that the claim is truer than the counterclaims that may be against it. The evidence that is selected by the author will be vital to support the thesis, and persuade the reader, and it must be logical, factual, solid and filled with data, examples and even quotations from experts in order to prove a point. All data gathered must also be sensible and useful as its purpose is not just to inform a person, but to persuade them to take the side of the claim and not the counterclaims.
Answer:
A. The government consisted of an assembly, a council, and courts.
C. Only free adult males made up the assembly.
D. The citizens elected leaders to discuss important matters.
E. Women, slaves, and foreigners were not allowed to participate.
Explanation:
Around 594 to 321 BC, in the Athenian polis, there was a democratic form of government. It is called the world's first democratic system. Any citizen had the right (and even the obligation) to participate in the work of the National Assembly. As it is noted by experts, in the heyday of Athenian democracy, about a third of citizens simultaneously held one or another public office.
Ancient Greek democracy was a limited democracy of only free citizens, leaving without the political rights slaves and women, who constituted the vast majority of the population; this ancient democracy was slave-owning democracy.
The national assembly met every 8-9 days, and several thousand people took part in it. Between the meetings of the ecclesia, the “council of five hundred,” was engaged in current affairs. Members of the council were elected by lot of citizens no younger than 30 years old. Litigation was heard in a "jury trial." It consisted of 6,000 people who were chosen by lot.
Answer:
A. Selective.
Explanation:
This could be looked at in the sense of a little disorder from little Andrew, though the act is selective, it could also come up as mutuism. Some adults with selective mutism are fully capable of speech and understanding language but are physically unable to speak in certain situations, though speech is expected of them.
The behaviour may be perceived as shyness or rudeness by others. A child with selective mutism may be completely silent at school for years but speak quite freely or even excessively at home. There is a hierarchical variation among people with this disorder: some people participate fully in activities and appear social but do not speak, others will speak only to peers but not to adults, others will speak to adults when asked questions requiring short answers but never to peers, and still others speak to no one and participate in few, if any, activities presented to them.
