Answer: D. n + q = 20
5n + 25q = 300
Step-by-step explanation:
Let n represent the number of nickels that you have.
Let q represent the number of quarters that you have.
Suppose you have 20 coins. It means that
n + q = 20
The total value of the coins is $3. The value of a quarter is $0.25 and the value if a nickel is $0.05. Therefore, the equation would be
0.05n + 0.25q = 3
Multiplying both sides of the equation by 100, it becomes
5n + 25q = 300
The correct option is
D. n + q = 20
5n + 25q = 300
All we have to do here is divide 4 by 2
4 ÷ 2 = 2
Therefore, the artist can paint 2 paintings an hour making the unit rate, 2 paintings per hour.
Hope this helps
-AaronWiseIsBae
Answer:
The conditional statement "∀x, If x is an insect, then x has six legs" is derived from the statement "All insects have six legs" using "a. existential" generalization
Step-by-step explanation:
In predicate logic, existential generalization is a valid rule of inference that allows one to move from a specific statement, or one instance, to a quantified generalized statement, or existential proposition. In first-order logic, it is often used as a rule for the existential quantifier in formal proofs.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The given system is:
Since I prefer to use smaller numbers I'm going to divide both sides of the first equation by 3 and both sides of the equation equation by 6.
This gives me the system:
We could solve the first equation for 
and replace the second with that.
Let's do that.
Subtract 
on both sides:
So we are replacing the second in the second equation with 
which gives us:
Now recall the first equation we arranged so that was the subject. I'm referring to .
We can now find given that using the equation .
Let's do that.
with :
So the solution is (8,-1).
We can check this point by plugging it into both equations.
If both equations render true for that point, then we have verify the solution.
Let's try it.
with 
:
is a true equation so the "solution" looks promising still.
with :
is also true so the solution has been verified since both equations render true for that point.
I think the first one is
x<3
And the second one is
x<2
