Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Rachel Carson received numerous attacks by agricultural and chemical industries due to the book she wrote called -Silent Spring', where she explained the repercussions to the atmosphere and that of human health in the using pesticides.
She has been tagged as a radical and unqualified scientist whose knowledge about science is limited. She was also accused of wanting to protect the lives of all the insects that spread diseases in humans and plants.
However, if we read concerning whom Rachel Carson was and what she stood for, we’ll notice that the arguments in various quarters are completely misguided.
She was an exceptional scientist and a writer on science topics, she investigated and cautioned on how the chemicals that government spread in the farms to kill pathogens insects, are also dangerous to all living things including humans.
Some of the chemical industry representatives even in this present time still do not concur with her; they are only concerned how to produce and sell more chemicals and they don’t even worry about their environmental consequences and damage. This is reason they prefer to berate her work and researches.
Answer:
Unitary variable cost= $42
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct Materials $14
Indirect Materials (variable) $4
Direct Labor $8
Indirect Labor (variable) $6
Other Variable Factory Overhead $10
During the period, the company produced and sold 1,000 units.
Under the variable cost method, the product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead:
Unitary variable cost= 14 + 8 + (4 + 6 + 10)= $42
Answer:
620 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Given that,
Direct materials (Standard Quantity) = 2.0 pounds
Direct materials (Standard Price) = $7.75 pounds
Units produced by company = 6,800
Materials quantity variance
:
= (standard quantity - Actual quantity) × standard price
= [(2.0 × 6,800) - (17,100 - 3,420)] × $7.75
= (13,600 - 13,680) × $7.75
= 620 Unfavorable
Answer:
No. She suffered no physical impact
Explanation:
Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when a person engages in an act that can cause severe emotional distress to another .
The plaintiff must be able to prove that the act was done willfully or provide an evidence that
- It was a result of defendant's negligence
- Plaintiff suffered emotional distress a direct result of the action
- The action was foreseeable by the defendant
- The plaintiff was in a danger zone
before he can win a claim.
The question here is how to prove emotional stress? The plaintiff must be able to show a verifiable physical injury that is linked to the emotional distressed suffered.
Answer:
Option A: Must be calculated on earned income as well as adjusted gross income in some cases
Explanation:
Earned Income Credit also abbreviated to EIC is known to be a refundable tax credit. It is usually for qualified (low-income) taxpayers who have earned income such as wages.
Earned income are simply wages, self-employment income, and eligible disability pay.
The reason/purpose of the Earned Income Credit is to limit or reduce the tax burden on working families with lower earned income.
