The probability of picking one girl would be
. That is because there are 5 girls out of the 12 students, and the probability of an event occuring is:
.
Using that same logic, the next student should be easier. We reduced the student population by 1, so we have 11 possible ways it can happen now instead of 12, so that gives us:
, for the probability of picking a boy as the second pick.
And lastly, using the same logic shown above, the probability of picking a girl on the third pick would be:
.
We are not done, though. We have the separate probabilities, but now we have to multiply then together to figure out the probability of this exact event happening:

Which when reduced is:

Answer:
AC and OA
Step-by-step explanation:
-A secant is a line connecting two points on the circle.
-Given the square OABC of sides 6cm and a circle of r=5cm and the center of the circle as O, and that the radius of the circle is less than the side of the square:
-The circle passes through OA and OC, but doesn't pass through AB and BC.
Hence, AC and OA are the circle's secants.
The most likely answer is D) <span>"The date that the check is written is usually a few days before it is cashed. We record when it was cashed and you record when its written".
There is usually a delay between when you write someone a check (and record it in your ledger) and when that person cashes it (when the bank records it). </span>
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
c) For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion workers belonged to unions is significantly higher than 11.3%
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=400 represent the random sample taken
X=52 represent the workers belonged to unions
estimated proportion of workers belonged to unions
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Part a
We want to test if the true proportion of interest is higher than 0.113 so then the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Part b
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
Part c
For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion workers belonged to unions is significantly higher than 11.3%
Answer:
side length and perimeter of 1 face
area of 1 face and surface area
Step-by-step explanation:
Just did it