Answer:
The minimum cost would be 480$ when Inna works for 8 hours and Jim works for 20 hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following information in the question:
Charges for 1 hour for Inna = $15
Number of pages typed by Inna in 1 hour = 6
Charges for 1 hour for Jim = $18
Number of pages typed by Jim in 1 hour = 8
Let x be the number of hours Inna work and let y be the number of hours Jim work.
Total cost = 
We have to minimize this cost.
Then, we can write the following inequalities:

The corner points as evaluated from graph are: (8,20) and (24,8)
C(8,20) = 480$
C(24,8) = 504$
Hence, the minimum cost would be 480$ when Inna works for 8 hours and Jim works for 20 hours.
The attached image shows the graph.
Options:
A. Both the Highlands and the Lowlands data points are evenly distributed around the center.
B. Both the Highlands and the Lowlands data points are clustered toward the left of the plot.
C. The Highlands data points are evenly distributed around the center, while the Lowlands data points are clustered toward the left of the plot.
D. The Highlands data points are clustered toward the left of the plot, while the Lowlands data points are evenly distributed.
Answer:
B. Both the Highlands and the Lowlands data points are clustered toward the left of the plot.
Step-by-step Explanation:
From the dot plots displaying rainfall totals for highland and lowland areas as shown in the diagram attached below, we can clearly observe that most of the dots on the plot tend to be more concentrated towards the left of the plot, compared to the concentration of dots toward the right of the plot.
Invariably, we can infer that data points for lowlands and Highlands are clustered toward the left of the plot.
Therefore, the statement that is true, comparing the shapes of the dot plot is B. "Both the Highlands and the Lowlands data points are clustered toward the left of the plot."
Answer:
it should be D....due to the fact that opposite over adjacent for the missing length
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
C is too small to have more.