Ask question

Ask question

All categories

marishachu [46]

2 years ago

11

Which of the following generational groups is most likely to represent the present owners of cottages surrounding Witmer Lake?A)

Baby Boomers.
B) Echo Boomers.
C) Gen Xers.
D) Lost Generation.
E) Millennials.

1 answer:

yawa3891 [41]2 years ago

8 0

I think it’s d but try to search it D

You might be interested in

Gator Tires pays a constant annual dividend of $1.21 per share. How much are you willing to pay for one share if you require a r

lora16 [44]

Answer:

I will pay $13 for one share

Explanation:

Dividend Valuation method is used to value the stock price of a company based on the dividend paid, its growth rate and rate of return. The price is calculated by calculating present value of future dividend payment.

Formula to calculate the value of stock

Price = Dividend / ( Rate or return - growth rate )

Due to constant payment of dividend there is no growth in the dividend

Price = $1.21 / ( 9.3% - 0% )

Price = $1.21 / 9.3%

Price = $13

3 0

2 years ago

A U.S. manufacturing company operating a subsidiary in an LDC (less-developed country) shows the following results: U.S. LDC Sal

Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

Part A:

Labur Productivity:

For US=5.14, LDC=1.35

Capital Productivity:

For US=1.72 LDC=4.31

Part B:(Multi factor productivity)

For US=1.29 LDC=1.03

Part C: (Raw material productivity)

For US=4.90 LDC=10.02

Explanation:

Part A:

Labur Productivity:

For US:

$Partial Labor Productivity=\frac{Sale(units)}{Labour(hours} \\Partial Labor Productivity=\frac{100505}{19550} \\Partial Labor Productivity=5.14$

For LDC:

$Partial Labor Productivity=\frac{Sale(units)}{Labour(hours} \\Partial Labor Productivity=\frac{19600}{14550} \\Partial Labor Productivity=1.35$

Capital Productivity:

For US:

$Capital Productivity=\frac{Sale(units)}{Capital Equipment} \\Capital Productivity=\frac{100505}{58600}\\Capital Productivity=1.72$

For LDC:

$Capital Productivity=\frac{Sale(units)}{Capital Equipment} \\Capital Productivity=\frac{19600}{4550}\\Capital Productivity=4.31$

Part B:

For US:

$Multifactor Productivity=\frac{Sales(units)}{labour(Hours) + Capital Equipment(hours)}\\ Multifactor Productivity=\frac{100505}{19550+58600} \\Multifactor Productivity=1.29$

For LDC:

$Multifactor Productivity=\frac{Sales(units)}{labour(Hours) + Capital Equipment(hours)}\\ Multifactor Productivity=\frac{19600}{14550+4550} \\Multifactor Productivity=1.03$

Part C:

For US:

$Raw material productivity=\frac{Sales(Hour)}{Raw Material} \\ Raw material productivity=\frac{100505}{20500} \\ Raw material productivity=4.90$

ForLDC:

Converting Raw material FC into $ (1$=10FC)

Raw Material =19550/10=$1955

$Raw material productivity=\frac{Sales(Hour)}{Raw Material} \\ Raw material productivity=\frac{19600}{1955} \\ Raw material productivity=10.02$

3 0

2 years ago

Twist Corp. has a current accounts receivable balance of $457,615. Credit sales for the year just ended were $2,940,600.a. What

Alexus [3.1K]

Answer and Explanation:

The computations are as follows

a. For company receivable turnover

As we know it is

= Credit Sales ÷ current account receivable balance

= $2,940,600 ÷ $457,615

= 6.43 times

b.

Now

company's days' sales in receivables is

= 365 ÷ Receivables turnover ratio

= 365 ÷ 6.43

= 56.77 days

c. Therefore the average collection period is the same as days sales in receivable i.e 56.77 days

4 0

2 years ago

Brenda is a purchasing agent for Commodities Exchange Corporation. Dennis, a Commodities corporate officer, gives Brenda written

son4ous [18]

Answer:

Yes, the firm Commodities Exchange Corporation is liable to E-products Inc. as it has entered into a contract with Brenda who had written authority to buy on behalf of the firm.

Explanation:

Indeed, the risk of Commodities stretches out to E-Products. This is mostly a direct result of the risk of the chief is towards the operator for the agreement the specialist is the gathering in the interest of the head. Aside from this, there is an express power having a place with Brenda as she was given the approval from the head. Because of express, an evident position E-Products got the affirmation that Commodities is being spoken to by Brenda.

There is no close to home risk of Brenda to pay for the different fringe gadgets to the E-Products. Because of evident position, it was a reality clear to E-Products that Brenda is just going about as an operator for Commodities. As these items were purchased for the utilization of the head as opposed to the individual utilization of Brenda in this way she doesn't have any obligation.

4 0

2 years ago

Arjun has joined a work team that assembles products. What is the best way for Arjun to build the team's trust in him?

QveST [7]

Help them and also bring some tools to help assemble the prducts

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers