Correct question is;
Tanya walked for 17 minutes from her home to a friend that lives 1.5 kilometers away. D(t) models Tanyas remaining distance to walk in kilometers, t minutes since she left home. What number type is more appropriate for the domain of d?
Answer:
0 ≤ t ≤ 17 ; (0, 17)
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told that she has walked for 17 minutes from her home to a friend that lives 1.5 kilometers away.
Now, we want to find the domain of numbers that shows her remaining distance.
Since she spent 17 minutes, then it means in modeling remaining distance it could be from 0 to 17 minutes as the case may be. Thus, the domain can be written as;
0 ≤ t ≤ 17 ; (0, 17)
Answer:
11.58%
Step-by-step explanation:
The initial volume if blood flowing through the artery is given by

To achieve a new volume of 155% (55% increase) of the initial volume, the new radius must be:
![V'= 1.55V\\1.55V=k(r')^4\\1.55kr^4 = k(r')^4\\(\sqrt[4]{1.55}*r)^4=(r')^4 \\(1.1158*r)^4=(r')^4 \\r'=1.1158*r](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%27%3D%201.55V%5C%5C1.55V%3Dk%28r%27%29%5E4%5C%5C1.55kr%5E4%20%3D%20k%28r%27%29%5E4%5C%5C%28%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B1.55%7D%2Ar%29%5E4%3D%28r%27%29%5E4%20%5C%5C%281.1158%2Ar%29%5E4%3D%28r%27%29%5E4%20%5C%5Cr%27%3D1.1158%2Ar)
Since the new radius is 1.1158 times larger than the initial radius, the percentage increased is:

Answer:
A Type II error is when the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected even when the alternative hypothesis is true.
In this case, it would represent that the new program really increases the pass rate, but the sample taken is not enough statistical evidence to prove it. Then, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
The consequence is that the new method would be discarded (or changed) eventhough it is a real improvement.
Step-by-step explanation: